@ cj,

1. you’ve stated the obvious & reiterated the opposite of my entire point.. that arriving at an empirical fact isn’t a matter of subjective impression but rather objective observation.. i never said that song hye kyo is plastic bc i said so.. but rather the other way around..

2. contrary to your own charge, i’m not so much mifffed by bit for disagreeing with me, as much as merely put-off for implying i’m seeing things because i want to.. he/she is the one who said as much (you can read it above).. which precisely sparked my comment in return..

3. i actually wouldn’t want to imply that people are just plain dumb with my little quote.. you can take it as simply meaning they aren’t seeing what’s in front of them.. nothing more..

@marcel, has it occurred to you that what you are so sure is artificial can strike someone else as natural? i mean, just because you’re convinced she’s plastic doesn’t mean she is. the certainty you feel can be felt by someone else for the opposite reason.

and i don’t think you should be miffed at other people disagreeing with you when you’re calling them “blind” and insinuating they’re dumb for not noticing. you’re doing the same thing you accuse others of doing to you.

btw, i don’t know if she’s plastic or not and i don’t care, but people’s insistence on knowing for sure either way is silly.

before i call it a day from arguing this ridiculous issue once and for all.. it seems to me that people just don’t notice & would rather believe the ideal.. which is lucky for her..

i just see what i see.. of course she is extremely pretty.. but my point is that those features appear artificial now..

i’m feeling a bit miffed at the suggestion that i’m closed-minded & seeing things because i “want” to.. so i say let the blind continue leading the blind..

http://youtube.com/watch?v=AbBFaRWWlIQ

I don’t think it’s a stretch to have perfect features naturally it maybe rare but not impossible. I don’t think that in of itself is proof of anything. So far the evidence does not lead me to believe she’s had anything done. It looks to me her features aren’t a recent development and she’s had them since she was a child. So I don’t see what you’re seeing. There could be a simple explanation…that she is just very very pretty.

Could it be that you’re seeing changes because you want to see them? Anyone can take 2 dissmiliar photos and point out differences…but does that prove surgery?

I know alot of kcelebs have surgery but I hope you will keep an open mind and judge people on a case by case basis and really look at the evidence. That’s what I will continue doing.

http://i110.imagethrust.com/images/3MkA/view-image/songpics.html

In the end I guess Song Hye Kyo’s great beauty maybe her greatest liability. :/

joe odagiri & lee na young together would be heaven meeting the earth.. have to say they’re probably the two most naturally beautiful people i’ve ever laid eyes on..

yup.. it was like fighting in the nuclear 3rd world war on that thread.. popseoul almost caused a virtual armageddon over the issue of plastic surgery..

for me it’s just something about most kcelebs i see onscreen & not just song hye kyo.. i have seen her childhood & school pics & wouldn’t deny her natural born beauty.. she’s always had handsome features.. but i just noticed recently in some of her close-ups she looks like she now has the telltale nose, lip & cheek implants as well as enhanced double-eyelids.. it’s very subtle but even in the above pic you can see how all of her features look a little tooo perfect O_o

at the end of the day.. i understand she’s an actress & she’s gotta do what she’s gotta do to survive in the industry.. & i’ll appreciate her more for her acting ability than anything else.. but being able to notice the changes in a k-actor’s facial features tells me i’ve been consuming way too much k-entertainment for my own good O_O