Comments on: Gu Hye-sun presents an art exhibition

By: Maggie47

Maggie47 — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:47:48 +0000

I think that they are far from being doodles. The fact is that art means different things to different people, its most appealing and anything that keeps her in the spotlight is okay by me. If she encourages one person to try their best at what they love, her job is done.

By: CryZtaL_06

CryZtaL_06 — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:28:13 +0000

wow..
that’s amazing…
i’m also into arts and i think that her drawing is fantastic…
it has so many meanings….

By: rheababe

rheababe — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:36:25 +0000

what ever i do like everything for her…i really love her.. how simple person maybe you didn’t notice it right? fighting hye sunna.just smille for those critisizesm huh..you just continued your good oppurtunity…like just once in your life time. atleast you can do better/best compared to the other….there’s nothing but to you know…ahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa..

By: rheababe

rheababe — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:31:12 +0000

oh…i’m just saying…..kenyang if you couldn’t do anything better, its better to wrapped up your mouth..atleast she can do better than us huh? so whats the matters w/her? also those her talents work….! i bit you guys you might be just feel jealous to gu hye sun because shes a popular now…don’t get nerves huh…just give her cheer up..and support her..either you like her or not…keyfets…..maasalammmmmmmmmmmmma..

By: hither

hither — Sun, 31 May 2009 10:48:55 +0000

” But I didn’t have any idea how a blogger could define an artist who he/she never knew too well and doesn’t have the backbone understanding what art really is. We are disappointed how manipulative one could possess to devour and distort an innocent work of art.” — from Worthy.

This i got to at least quote because its one of the things that made sense here. Before you blabber about something, please know at least the basics of what you are blabbering about. Although we can amateurishly criticize an artwork, we should not categorize and label an artwork as something ” non-professional “. It is a superfluous way of looking at art. its like putting art and creativity into a box, and that’s not how you critique or judge an artwork. The word “professional” may sound odd to a “true” painter/artist and judging from how the blogger defined “professional”, even Picasso and Van Gogh may question your terminology..

By: depth

depth — Thu, 28 May 2009 06:09:02 +0000

TO asdf: I think ur definition of professionalism in terms of art is somewhat skewed. Her sketches u said is too emo/angsty for ur liking, so that’s one interpretation, and i believe every other art work is open to all kinds of interpretations and critiquing be it on a scholarly or non-scholarly level (like what we’re doing here), and consequently EVERY ARTIST ALSO has a right to have her artworks exhibited whether you like her works or not.

By: asdf

asdf — Tue, 26 May 2009 07:25:43 +0000

to shaz: its professional when she does things the professonal way. e.g: hold an exhibition. When she wants to be taken seriously, she has to take critisism.

and her works are seriously not fit for exhibiting yet. They look like sketches of ideas that just popped out of her head in her free time. Some can definately be developed into something impressive, but she has’nt taken the effort to do it yet.

However, kudos to her on trying to develop her own style instead of copying. But, it is seems like she has just developed her style and using that style not second nature to her yet — some of her works seems forced. And her works are too dark/emo/angst for my liking.

Is it me or her style seems like the chinese sugar syrup painting?
you know the kind that the person drips the syrup in one continous stroke to form a dragon or butterfly and stick a stick in the middle so it can be held up like a lollipop?