It’s worrying that I have a small suspicion of incest for 100MSFTS (am I just ignorant?). This drama just keeps getting more controversial. But my heart is fully down the rabbit hole for now.
The hints they’ve dropping so far – it looks like the case, doesn’t it?
Especially the part where Tak said “JK shouldn’t be dating MY if MY is the boy from the past”. But I can’t understand JG! He’s the selfish one here. I know he doesn’t want to reveal his past to JK but he’s letting them to fall into a hell together.
MY mentioned that he had a “little brother”. Maybe because he doesn’t have any memories before he was 5, he could have mistaken the little brother for a little sister (who is JK). JG shot their dad, who was a violent criminal. Then somehow the boy (MY) ran off (maybe because he had witnessed the scene), and JG was only able to find the little girl (JK). JG then decided to raise JK in some twisted way to deal with his guilt.
In that case, their sex scene is just… Not Okay. BUT I have another theory that makes a lot more sense. MY’s dream of a gun shooting a man is a memory, but the man is not his dad, it’s JK’s dad. MY and JK may have been friends or raised together before MY was 5, so MY was close to JK’s dad, but not directly related. JG shot JK’s dad and MY witnessed it, which is why JG was looking for MY. But still… why would you raise the child of the man you murdered, and not tell her?? JG needs to consider JK’s situation as well and stop being so selfish about his guilt.
suk
November 1, 2018 at 11:22 PM
It’s worrying that I have a small suspicion of incest for 100MSFTS (am I just ignorant?). This drama just keeps getting more controversial. But my heart is fully down the rabbit hole for now.
cherry 🍒
November 2, 2018 at 12:03 AM
The hints they’ve dropping so far – it looks like the case, doesn’t it?
Especially the part where Tak said “JK shouldn’t be dating MY if MY is the boy from the past”. But I can’t understand JG! He’s the selfish one here. I know he doesn’t want to reveal his past to JK but he’s letting them to fall into a hell together.
suk
November 2, 2018 at 11:02 AM
MY mentioned that he had a “little brother”. Maybe because he doesn’t have any memories before he was 5, he could have mistaken the little brother for a little sister (who is JK). JG shot their dad, who was a violent criminal. Then somehow the boy (MY) ran off (maybe because he had witnessed the scene), and JG was only able to find the little girl (JK). JG then decided to raise JK in some twisted way to deal with his guilt.
In that case, their sex scene is just… Not Okay. BUT I have another theory that makes a lot more sense. MY’s dream of a gun shooting a man is a memory, but the man is not his dad, it’s JK’s dad. MY and JK may have been friends or raised together before MY was 5, so MY was close to JK’s dad, but not directly related. JG shot JK’s dad and MY witnessed it, which is why JG was looking for MY. But still… why would you raise the child of the man you murdered, and not tell her?? JG needs to consider JK’s situation as well and stop being so selfish about his guilt.
cherry 🍒
November 2, 2018 at 12:52 PM
I also find it sick to take in and raise the daughter of a man you killed. That’s just twisted…
BTW I read somewhere else from a Korean speaker that MY only said it was his “dongsaeng” which didn’t specify the gender, so it’s still unclear.