1,065

Lee Jun-ki offered tvN legal-action drama Lawless Attorney

There are multiple reasons to be excited at news of Lee Jun-ki (Criminal Minds) being courted for another tvN drama, not least because that means Lee Jun-ki is likely to come back to television soon, which I always welcome, even if his projects don’t always turn out so well. But apparently I will never give up on him despite a number of subpar dramas (Criminal Minds, Scholar Who Walks the Night, Moon Lovers: Scarlet Heart Ryeo…), because he’s due for a good one any day now, right? Right?

This new series is called Lawless Attorney, and if Lee Jun-ki accepts the offer, it would reunite him with his Time of Dog and Wolf director, PD Kim Jin-min (who also directed The Liar and His Lover, Marriage Contract, Pride and Prejudice, and La Dolce Vita). As Dog and Wolf was one of his best dramas, the idea fills me with cautious optimism, especially since this drama looks to bring back Lee’s grittier side as a former gangster turned lawyer on a revenge mission.

The role Lee Jun-ki is considering positively in Lawless Attorney is Bong Sang-pil, a “gangster lawyer” who doesn’t trust the law and feels free to use his fists. He takes advantage of loopholes in the law and boasts an excellent win rate. Other lawyers may consider the legal code sacred, but he considers it more of a tool “like an appliance user manual.” He fights against those in absolute power, standing all alone in the world, driven solely by the thought of avenging his mother.

Lawless Attorney promises an exciting story of growth of maturation, as well as action and thrills. Well, it’s Lee Jun-ki, so action is just a gimme at this point. The drama is being planned as a Saturday-Sunday drama to follow writer Noh Hee-kyung’s Live, which follows currently airing Hwayugi.

Via IS Plus, Sports Chosun

RELATED POSTS

Tags: , ,

1,065

Required fields are marked *

Chingus—After devouring the first 10 episodes in five days, I took an additional four days to complete episodes 11-12. My slow watch is a combination of savoring and dreading the story’s machinations. I’m breaking down my thoughts into three posts.

1/3
Ep. 11-12 | The Love Story
Like @persianrose noted in post #128, I’m conflicted about the turn in Sang-pil and Jae-yi’s relationship. At the start of this series, I couldn’t have anticipated how much I would grow to love their realistic and low-key pairing. Now that they are estranged, I realize that I was wrong about their love not be central to the story. Specifically, the pursuit of romance is not the main storyline. Rather, their trust and partnership was our respite from the Sturm und Drang of Gisung City. Be it @caeparius’ Noble Idiocy or part of some strategem, I fear the separation will make them both more reckless.

Given the realities of politics, I don’t expect punishment for all the corrupted characters. But I’ll be heartbroken if Sang-pil and Jae-yi are unable to reconcile. It was so refreshing to have two people—with childhood wounds and all—still approach a romance with such trust and transparency.

6
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

@caeparius—I tagged you in above post; not sure why it didn't display properly.

0
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

DB has finally "blacklisted" me! It is because I am so vocal about the pending Gnome Apocalypse. They have been after me for years. They are making their move, if you do not hear from me in the future, FIGHTING!

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Release the Attack Flamingos!

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

2/3
Ep. 11-23 | Mothers
One of the glorious aspects of Lawless Lawyers is its exploration of the messiness of motherhood. Our mothers run the gamut:

Righteous lawyer Choi Jin-ae is fearless and steadfast, but her actions endanger her son, Bong Sang-pil. She’s the linchpin of our story because her life and death drive her son’s revenge.

The discussion in @marcusnyc20's (boon-soo) #135 thread about Jae-yi’s mom reflects my own ambivalence about this character. Perhaps Noh Hyun-joo and Uncle Dae-wong had a good plan in place but DW’s murder seems to have set off a cascade of crazy. Unlike the vengeful Bride in Kill Bill, HJ has everything to lose. I cringed at her insistence that Sang-pil should let Soon-ja go. It comes from a place of love and desperation but it denies her daughter’s agency. If she really knew her now-adult child, she’d know this was a terrible request.

Nam Soon-ja—the toady poster child of avarice and sycophancy—is the only mother of our series who raised her child without interruption. She exists only to elevate her daughter, Prosecutor Yeon-hee, to a position of power. I pray we’re not denied an explosion of murderous, maternal fury from Soon-ja—I fully expect her flared nostrils and jutting jaw spattered with blood by the end of the series.

3
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

As I have said before this is a "Justice [not Revenge] K-Drama". If you believe that Sang-Pil is after revenge you have missed a very important point.

I take issue with your assertion that Sang-Pil's mother endangered her son. You make it sound as if she knew confronting Moon-Sook would lead to her and sons deaths. She had no idea what Moon-Sook was capable of. Her only mistake was believing in a person who was pure evil. Believing in people is what made her a good person, lawyer and mother. It was part of her core being. You are blaming the victim for the criminals actions.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I should emphasize this too: "Justice [not Revenge] K-Drama". BSP wants to punish judge and her puppets who are killing people with law, using "law".

3
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

@caeparius & @persianrose—Understood. I get that Sang-pil is seeking justice through the law. Otherwise, why bother get his GED, pass the bar, establish a career, set up shop in Gisung, fight Moon-sook in court, gather evidence ...

My intention isn't to blame Sang-pil's mother. I'm pointing out that being brave has risks; Mom doesn't have our benefit of hindsight to know the depths of Moon-sook's ambition.

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Living has risks. For example, deciding to cross the road [rogue chickens], taking a bath [slip and fall], eating a meal I have prepared [only one confirmed mild poisoning], me cooking part deux [only one serious grease fire] could all be risky.

I was confused by the phrase "her actions endanger her son", but what we write is sometimes not the thought we intended to communicate. The antics of semantics!

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

3/3
Cha Mun-Sook: A Case Study of Psychopathy
Given the show’s expanded notions of family, I include Judge Cha Mun-sook among the mothers of Lawless Layers. After dispatching Hyun-joo, she actively mentored young Ha Jae-yi, paid for her education and invited JY to call her “Mother.”

@persianrose's question about CMS being a psychopath is an interesting one because I’ve been long fascinated by the blurry edge between pathology and just being a bastard. I’ll gently disagree with @caeparius's #131 assertion that maternal feelings are preposterous for Moon-sook. Her charm, ruthlessness and murderous manipulations do not preclude her from loving her (adopted) family, being a good judge and even a (grotesque) mother figure. Yes, she’s bloody awful, but maternal feelings do not have to be consistent or even come from a place of good.

@egads' #131 query about the possible gendered aspect of the psychopath question is equally intriguing. For me, it’s not a matter of gender. Both the judge and the mayor present themselves as “parents” to the people they support or protect. The difference is that Ah MIn-soo never forgets that he’s a gangster at the service of his master. The judge, however, believes her in her own piety. The most telling facet of her sociopathy is her demonic ability to manipulate and smite people in her swampy orbit while staying clean.

It’s deeply rewarding to have such fully-realized villains. As Alan Rickman was purported to have said, he didn’t play villains; he played “interesting people.” I can’t tell you the name of the hero in Die Hard, but I’ll always remember Hans Gruber.

4
18
reply

Required fields are marked *

@caeparius—I tagged you in my third post above; not sure why it didn't display properly.

0
13
reply

Required fields are marked *

DB has finally "blacklisted" me! It is because I am so vocal about the pending Gnome Apocalypse. They have been after me for years. They are making their move, if you do not hear from me in the future...

*defiantly, fist in air*
F I G H T I N G !

2
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

? It's odd how tagging worked with @name straight but doesn't work when I add an apostrophe (unlike other names, which are unaffected). Curious ...

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sorry, I prefer my "blacklist" conspiracy theory...

2

Please do not confuse the issue with facts. I never let Occam's Razor get in the way of a good conspiracy.

2

I'm not receiving any notification for this thread either! @tsutsuloo @caeparius are you getting notifications?!

2
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

I seem to sneeze and sure enough there is a new reply or mention for me. Doesn't it work that way for you?

cc: @tsutsuloo, @persianrose

1
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Haha, I got this one, but I didn't get any notification for @tsutsuloo tagging!

2

She has been "blacklisted"!

2

I am @persianrose.

1
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

@tsutsuloo are you really @persianrose? Isn't it against DB policy to post with two separate accounts? You do realize that at times you post two different options. Duel personalities?

4

Hahaha @caeparius

3

CORRECTION: options -> opinions

DAM! - auto-correct...

0

Ha, ha! For want of a comma.

1

This is a quote from PARENT post 131:

The seemingly good things that Moon-Sook may have done for Jae-Yi are all what I would consider as "fruit from a poisonous tree". They have no value because of the source. They would only have value if she was sorry and willing to take responsibility for her past actions.

I stand behind the above assertion and all the others I made in that post. I guess we have to just agree to disagree. Our definition of what makes someone a "mother" is just too different.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Since agreeing to disagree about this, let me leave you with the following rhetorical question:

Person [A] intentionally kills person [B] with full forethought for their actions [cold blooded] then later saves the life of person [C]. Is person [A] a murder?

PLEASE do not post an answer [rhetorical question].

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I like this: "Yes, she’s bloody awful, but maternal feelings do not have to be consistent or even come from a place of good"... We will see if she actually has maternal feelings or HJY is part of her BIG plan as well!

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

From Collins English Dictionary:

Maternal is used to describe feelings or actions which are typical of those of a kind mother toward her child.

Even assuming the "kind" description is too much. Does Moon-Sook really fit this definition?
NOTE: In addition, "makjang" is NOT present in the definition.

cc: @persianrose, @tsutsuloo

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

FUN FACTOID: Occam's Razor is the problem-solving principle that, when presented with competing hypothetical answers to a problem, one should select the answer that makes the fewest assumptions.

3
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

NOTE: K-Drama writers are specifically trained to ignore Occam's Razor.

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Ha!

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@caeparius are you Latin literature expert by any chance?

2
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

No, but I have an interest in word origins. The internet requires user names, passwords and email addresses. Latin can come in handy for these items. My alias "caeparius" means "onion seller/merchant" in Latin. It was originally chosen as a temporary ebay alias. It has lasted much longer than intended and has become my anonymous user name. I would have preferred nemo, ["nobody" in Latin] but DAM! Disney made that impossible.

4
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

You have such an interesting interest :))
And I like your anonymous user name, it has such mysterious vibe!

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Let's hear it for philology and etymology! Manseh!

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@pakalanapikake - it is nothing that formal, just a bit of tinkering.

About 80 percent of the entries in any English dictionary are borrowed, mainly from Latin. Over 60 percent of all English words have Greek or Latin roots. In the vocabulary of the sciences and technology, the figure rises to over 90 percent. About 10 percent of the Latin vocabulary has found its way directly into English without an intermediary.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Like you, I've long been interested in word origins and roots. I grew up with my mother's Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, most likely the 5th edition (1947). It spoiled me with its detailed word derivations. Lesser dictionaries skimp on this vital component -- as well as thumb notches.

I worked as a German translator, with anthropology as one of my main areas. In addition to lots of technical and scientific terminology, there was a fair amount of social-science vocabulary that did not appear in normal or even specialized German dictionaries. The ability to recognize Germanized Latin and Greek turned out to be a very useful skill. It was fun, too.

1

Re Post 152: @tstsuloo BSP mother told AOJ: "I will settle any disputes through the law..." . Rather than bravery, she just did what she was supposed to do as a Human Right Lawyer. Imaging if she hasn't tried to bring CMS to justice, what would've happened?! She probably had to run away whole her life with BSP!! BSP's Mom is his role model, thus he is not going for revenge but justice!

5
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sorry, I mean @tsutsuloo

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Good points, @persianrose.

For me—given that Choi Jin-ae was operating in a corrupt system—"doing her job" took on the mantle of bravery when it was easier, more profitable and safer to let things slide.

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sure, she was human right lawyer, this type of jobs, in such a corrupted condition, need extreme bravery in the first place! What I wanted to say is the moment she saw those pictures she was dead meat already! CMS would have killed her anyway...

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I was reading through all the comments, and wonder why there are not too many commented on actings!! I think actors in this drama are all so brilliant!! Specially the main four characters! One of my most favorite scenes in Lawless Lawyer are when attorney Bong confronts judge Cha. OMG! their chemistry is off the charts! They both have such fierce eyes and cunning smiles, it's like they're shooting daggers at each other!!

8
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Agreed @ljgangel! I love the word you coined on your fan page: enemance.

The casting is spot-on for everyone. I will be furious if Lee Hye-young (Cha Moon-sook) isn't nominated for every acting award available. I feel her nuanced performance is at the root our lively discussion upthread about her pathology and the nature of her complex feelings for Ha Jae-yi.

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I don't remember any other k-dramas made such a multi-faceted villains with such a complex like/hate relationships between enemies (HJY and CMS; BSP and AOJ; etc.)... So yes Enemence could be a new K-drama trope :)

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

LAWLESS LAWYER EPISODES 13 & 14 MARKER

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Episode 13: such a great episode, with so many turns and twists!!

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

THE "PERFECT" ANTIDOTE FOR NOBEL IDIOCY

Without going into too many details, who knew the perfect antidote for NOBLE IDIOCY would require treacherous gangsters, a loyal scorpion, a barrel, a corrupt mayor, a "swim with the fishes", and a lawless lawyer. This is one talented writer. The icing on the cake was by the end of the "treatment", Jae-Yi's mother was planning on visiting a shaman to get a "lucky" wedding date.

4
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I usually wait until both episodes are completely subbed, but wow maybe I should just jump right in. That seems like a lot of antidote.

3
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

If this helps, there was no uber dramatic cliff hanger. However, TEAM LAWLESS is posed and fully prepared to begin the final assault on Moon-Sook so the anticipation is electrifying.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Me too, but I dove into Ep. 13 when it was only subbed at 70%. Just finished the last bit this morning. It's my dream come true—a K-drama that isn't going of the rails. I wouldn't be surprised if Writer-nim completely storyboarded before filming. It's like he watched Secret Forest and realized, "Oh. We can tell tighter stories."

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

BEST HERO MONOLOGUE in K-DRAMA!

Moon-Sook's planning was masterful, she was using him to rid herself of all her liabilities. However, Moon-Sook's had made one fatal mistake. She never considered that he would partner with, the super sexy and almost perfect female role model, Jae-Yi. Their partnership would bring about her downfall and a couple of super adorable children, future lawyers.

NOTE: I may have taken some liberties with the wording.

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

SORRY, BUT GOING OFF TOPIC FOR A MOMENT

@egads - In a previous post we discussed the role of conflict in a K-Drama. The currently airing "What’s Wrong With Secretary Kim" is too perfect an example, of a K-Drama without conflict, to ignore. It is at episode 6 and thus far has relied completely on the unbelievable super cute, fish out of water main couple. However, even watching puppies and kittens play becomes akin to watching paint dry. This will happen a lot quicker than you might think. This K-Drama is rapidly approaching uber boring. It needs a rapid injection of conflict. Even with that it might be too late to properly save it. Poorly crafted conflict can be just as bad as no conflict. Be careful what you wish for, you might actually get it and be bored to tears.

4
17
reply

Required fields are marked *

Good point. Every good story needs a conflict of some sort as without it, why bother telling it because your audience will have no reason to be invested.

continuing the off topic However, I will have to agree to disagree with you about WWWSK for now. While so far the conflict seems to be very low stakes--The puppy's ego and newly realized feelings for the resigning kitten he has relied on--there are times when an audience wants/needs low impact conflict. Case in point, when reality, whether it be personal or otherwise, becomes conflict ridden itself. Escapism with fluffy puppies and kittens has its own place within fiction. Lawless Lawyer is yet another form of escapism with a conflict that most likely few of us will ever experience. The political plotting and corruption, disappearing mothers, gangsters, and the exciting fight sequences allow us to work through frustrations with our own every day through the excitement and angst of this fictional world. WWWSK, on the other hand, allows for a fantasy of a different sort. What each individual audience member wants or needs from their drama consumption varies, and what I most enjoy about the world of kdrama, is I can meet my own needs from the wide variety of genres and storytelling techniques that abound within it. While one person may be bored to tears while watching puppies and kittens frolic, another may need the soothing playfulness of it. Is WWWSK brilliantly plotted and crafted? Nope. Could it possibly devolve into a mess of ill conceived conflict and tropes? Yep. But I'm not writing it off just yet. In the meantime, I will enjoy the pretty and the petty, because honestly my own life is a little to real right now, and a fluffy petty puppy is just what I need.

7
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

@egads

LMAO - I literally meant real puppies and kittens playing. I was not referring to the cast in any way shape or form. You give me way to much credit for being clever.

"What’s Wrong With Secretary Kim" is at a pivotal place, in the next 2 episodes it needs to extend its storyline. Otherwise, it will be just another 8 episode K-Drama which aired 16 episodes to tell its story. I believe that extended storyline needs to come in the form of a conflict that will draw the viewers in, allowing the viewers to become more vested in the characters and drama-verse.

"1% of Anything (2016 OCN)" is an excellent example of a K-Drama that was able to stay lighthearted and feel good, with just the correct amount of conflict. It was a little old school, but managed to have a no-nonsense strong female lead with a kick butt BFF. In my book, this K-Drama is a must watch. I have several times. What makes it even more interesting is that it is a remake of an older K-Drama, but still manages to stay fresh.

4
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Oh, but puppies and kittens were so on point. Park Seo-joon is like a big floppy puppy to me, both here and in other roles. WWWSK is definitely on the cusp of either maintaining or doing a dive into mushiness.

1% is a favorite low stakes conflict with high satisfaction drama for me. I find strong female leads in these types of stories make for a more enjoyable viewing experience for me.

4
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Even a broke clock is correct twice a day. Finally, my love of watching puppies and kittens play has made me seem more intelligent.

There are several things that make "1% of Anything (2016 OCN)" a compelling watch. The female lead experiences almost no character growth, she does not need to. She is not perfect, but she is her own person with very strong beliefs and the courage to follow them. She is the catalyst to change the people around her. She helps the very flawed male lead reach his true potential. She also manages to help almost everyone she meets along the way.

The original writer was also responsible for the rewrite. Consequently, they story is even tighter than the original.

4

@caeparius June 24, 2018 at 7:12 AM

I didn't know that the original writer did the script for the 2016 remake. I've only seen the 2003 drama with Gang Dong-won.

Interestingly, Choi Min-soo, Hizzoner the Mayor of Gisung, was also in it, although I don't recall him. It was early in my non-sageuk watching.

1

@caeparius,

I'd like to respectfully point out that there's conflict and then there's conflict. In WHAT'S WRONG WITH SECRETARY KIM, I see plenty of internal conflict bubbling below the surfaces of the OTP, with hints of fraternal strain, personal and family trauma, and maybe a big fat birth secret, for all we know. ;-)

As far as absence of conflict is concerned, that has been raised to a high art form in manga / manhwa -- and Kdrama -- through the use of Ki-sho-ten-ketsu (4-part plot structure without inherent conflict). It lends itself particularly well to character studies, which is what we're seeing in WWWSK. ;-)

5
11
reply

Required fields are marked *

@pakalanapikake - Why so formal, you are scaring me. I am sorry, if I inadvertently offended you. You are obviously very knowledgable about this subject.

Slice-of-Life K-Dramas use only the conflicts experienced in daily life to drive the story forward. There are some really amazing slice-of-life K-Dramas available. I am a big fan! Life can not exist without some form of conflict. Regardless, of the type of conflict a 16 episode K-Drama needs 16 episodes worth of conflict. Not all of the 16 episodes have to have conflict in them, but there must be enough to carry the storyline. I suspect that "What’s Wrong With Secretary Kim" will be just another 8 to 10 episode K-Drama which aired 16 episodes to tell its story. I hope that I am wrong.

2
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

WWWSK is not a Slice-of-Life K-Dramas at all!! WWWSK is type of luxury rom-com made for 10-22 age-group... sure older generation can watch it too, while folding their laundries or running in the gym... to me there is absolutely zero conflict in that story (except some copy-paste child-oppa saved me so I love him now as an adult)

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

WHOA! - I never said or even implied that "What’s Wrong With Secretary Kim" was a slice-of-life K-Drama. I just followed up on @pakalanapikake assertion that there are many types of conflict. I discussed slice-of-life K-Dramas because the use a very subtle type of everyday conflict. IMHO slice-of-life K-Dramas are very difficult to write properly. Getting the correct amount of conflict to drive the story, but still remain true to genre is very difficult. Anyone who has suffered through a poorly written one understands the reference. A real snooze festival.

The only things I managed to decipher from your second statement is that you seem to have very odd laundry and exercise habits. What exactly is a "copy-paste child-oppa"? I found that phrase very very confusing.

3

I'm don't think anyone would mistake WWWSK as a slice of life drama. Additionally, I am far removed from the 10-22 age-group, but still enjoy watching a well made rom-com chaebol/candy or otherwise.

Is the conflict huge? No, but there is inner conflict for both leads, as well as the tropey shared childhood trauma. Is WWWSK ground-breaking? No, but not all dramas can be, nor should they be. As I stated in my previous post, the familiar is sought by some audiences for a variety of reasons. If this isn't your thing, no worries, I'll enjoy it, but I might not be folding laundry or running in the gym while I do.

3

@caeparius,

Oh, dear... I was just being polite and scholarly pedantic, as an educational service to fellow Beanies. So many poor souls bemoan boring, draggy Kdrama plots that go nowhere... and take forever to get there. Unlike that faithful old firehorse, Three-Act Structure, which reliably takes off like a shot and drags the viewer from beginning to middle to end in jig time, with no thought required.

*bats droopy eyelids*

Not to mention I was quite sleep deprived when writing the original post (and still am). This is my brain on no sleep. It's not a pretty sight. ;-)

I'll admit that I ramble on about ki-sho-ten-ketsu at the drop of a hat because it miraculously enabled me to appreciate Japanese and Korean dramas that didn't fit the common 3-act and 5-act forms I was exposed to as an English Literature major back when mastodons and sabre-tooth cats were still getting themselves trapped in the La Brea Tar Pits.

ki = introduction
sho = development
ten = twist
ketsu = conclusion

No conflict needed, central or otherwise. What a relief.

Back to your point that there may only be sufficient storyline for 8-10 episodes, and that it will be stretched and diluted to fill the necessary air time. That concern is always at the back of my mind.

Here's hoping that Writer-nim refrains from sticking us with excessive scenes of obnoxiously un-funny Se-ra and other gratuitous filler.

It looks as if Young-joon's parents are actually relatively normal for chaebols, so that's a plus.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

@pakalanapikake - I would like to focus in on the Manga/Manhwa and K-Drama portion of your post. To simplify matters I am going to refer to Manga/Manhwa as just Manhwa going forward. Though it is true that many Manhwa have been turned into K-Dramas, I believe the reverse is almost never true. It is much easier to take a high art form and adapt it to be small screen commercial entertainment. The tricky part is of course maintaining the original quality. I do not want to suggest the adaption does not require a talented writer. It most certainly does. However taking the lesser and turning it into the greater is a task of a much different scale.

As my sainted grandmother used to say your thumb is a finger, but not all fingers are thumbs. Your thumb is very special and can not be replaced. Then she would do the disappearing thumb trick and scare the hell out of me. I miss my grandmother.

2
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Apparently, grandma was wrong. It is possible to replace a missing thumb with your big toe.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

The manhwa is already composed in 4-part structure, and can be transposed into a drama. But taking a drama with structure other than 4-part and turning it into a manga could well change the narrative to something quite different from the original.

Somehow I'm reminded of the difference between turning a cow into hamburger vs. turning hamburger into a cow...

Your grandmother sounds like quite a card. In a good way. Aside from the whole missing thumb thing. ;-)

My Trope Detector seems to be going off for some odd reason...

0
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I have several smoke detectors in my house, but no trope detector. Where did you acquire yours? Was it expensive? Who makes it? Is it battery powered or AC powered?

1

@caeparius June 25, 2018 at 2:22 PM

About my Trope Detector. Believe it or not, it's a latent organ that has come into being after watching scads of Kdramas and Kmovies.

I'm not exactly sure where it's physically located, either. At times, I could swear that it seems to be abaft of my pineal, sort of a Kdrama "second sight." At other times, it feels as if it's playing peek-a-boo with my hara, although it seems to drift over behind my spleen occasionally. That would make sense at the gut level. Once in a while, it feels as if it's related to the hackles rising on the back of my neck. It really gets around. Very hard to pin down.

I suspect that you're onto something here, @caeparius. You could make a fortune inventing and selling Trope Detectors to the masses of Kdrama fans who apparently lack a predisposition to evolve their own biological ones. Perhaps a rudimentary Trope Detector could be engineered using the olfactory as a starting point. Follow your nose. ;-)

1

Finished ep.13 last night. This is what has me intrigued at this point. BSP uncle sacrificed himself but seemed to have a plan of his own in doing so. His leading man (KMB) seems to suddenly have turned on his own gang or "family" and now works directly for CMS herself. That was sudden. He is now seemingly the lead of the entire gang, the new leader and inheritor after BSP passes away and he chooses that moment to go to the other side and serve as CMS new "dog". KMB character is interesting in this episode for 2 reasons: 1. If his loyalty to BSP uncle was only skin deep then that shows his uncle had terrible judgement in choosing his number one man. The uncle himself told BSP trust no one. Yet, he puts himself at risk, dies and leaves the whole gang in KMB hands. Why make such a simplistic move to help CMS gain a stronger ally? 2. The encounter between (KMB) and CMS "number 1" (NSJ) is very interesting in this. It shows that KMB is no pushover to NSJ but in that scene Scorpion is in the background overhearing their exchange. There is something very subtle in that exchange that made me think , "What if KMB didn't betray BSP uncle? What if this was part of his uncle's plan? The knife against the gun. The only way to win that encounter would be to place an exactly strategic mortal wound in the opponent. To do this you need to get close enough to the enemy. CMS took an awful big risk in accepting KMB as someone within her inner circle. Wouldn't that add an interesting twist to all this?

4
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I think you are being too hard on Sang-Pil's uncle. It is impossible to know what is in anyone else's heart other than your own. People change and Moon-Sook is a master manipulator, she has been planning this for a very long time. She knows how to exploit peoples weaknesses. His 2nd, might have secretly feared that Sang-Pil would have eventually taken over from his uncle. Moon-Sook's plan allowed him to take over and frame Sang-Pil for his uncles murder [ie discredit him]. He may have secretly always perceived Sang-Pil as a rival to his leadership of the gang.

2
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

hi @caeparius, I actually was secretly hoping that the uncle had devised a plan to plant KMB in Moon-Sook's inner laird. I thought it would have added such a cool twist to it all....sadly, I think we are too close to the end for such a complicated turn of events, and the answers will unfold differently.....

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Congratulations @caeparius as revealed in ep 14 he was indeed jealous to BSP, therefore betrayed uncle... uncle was fully aware of his betrayal and thus he came to Gisung without his No 1 man and his team! I'm sure uncle planned something that will eventually help BSP bringing down CMS

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I mean to congratulate @caeparius for 100% correct speculation this time 😉

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

In my last comment, I meant to write, after BSP's uncle passes away......sorry for the typo.

1
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Oh no.
I just realized that this drama is going to end. It will be over.
I'm not ready.
I'm enjoying the cruelly twisty turny way it is.
I don't even care what this reveals about me as a person.
Arghl.

7
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm not ready at all! I love/hate all the characters and want to watch them more! Can they make a season 2 please...

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I love that the noble idiocy turned out to be an elaborate instead. What I love more is our couple is back together to kick ass for the last few eps. Now I just have to try to wait patiently for ep 13 subs without watching it raw. It's so hard!

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

*ep14

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I knew that they're not going to throw an outdated k-drama NI trope in such well-writen and wll-executed drama...

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I believe this is not a right place to discuss WWWSK, but just to avoid any confusion, I post this here. I did not mean to say that only 10-22 yr should watch the drama (I'm watching it myself and I'm in my late 30s), I mean the drama made for that age group or should be more appealing for that age group!! Although the two leads are in their early 30s, they most of the time behave like 18-yr olds!! All the comedic parts are quite cartoonish too!! Not necessarily in a bad way, they're just mean to be that way! It's an easy watch rom-com (with lots of luxurious items that makes it more watchable because people naturally like oppa in luxury outfits and vehicles!!)... their childhood trauma so far seems to be a mixture of Kill Me Heal Me + H and J &I... no special conflict at least so far...

3
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Why, I am confused?

0
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Haha, probably because my English is too bad 😯

0
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

No worries, your English is just fine.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I think LL as a series has quite a few plot holes that require suspension of disbelief but its entertainment value makes up for it. An Oh Ju is getting to be quite a likeable villain, with his witty repartee and rather glorious singing even as he bludgeons someone with his name plate. Prosecutor SB has been underused in the last few episodes and I like his interactions with BSP. BSP's character is all the better for respecting someone who always brings him down a notch or two. It's ironic that BSP and HJI end up working with and defending all of Judge Cha's key minions. I would find it hard to even tolerate the man who stabbed my mum or the woman who ordered her death (NSP did coldbloodedly order HJI's mum death). That collaboration does humanise the bad guys and the drama's better for it.

I am very new to k-drama/korean culture and only familiar with Chinese norms but is it weird that HJI and BSP get called by their full names even by their loved ones. Why not just SP or JI?

6
7
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

About BSP & HJY keep calling each other in full names, that's my peeves too! I thought it was me nitpicking Bong-Ha couple ^^;;
Some said that couples don't suddenly drop honorifics, especially the new couple. But they already over phase 3 on ep 6, add honorifics -ssi should be okay, right? rather keep calling each other in full names. Oh well, maybe it's Korean thing that I don't familiar with....

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

It's because they're working with each other... As far as I know in Korean culture, workplace senior/junior, calling people with their designation (Doctor, Attorney, Prosecutor, CEO, etc...) and honorific talking is very important, even close family call each other like that... BSP always calls HJY with her first name whenever they're out of workplace...

2
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, I noticed the work titles - eg Attorney Ja, but the formality between the couple is a bit weird even by Asian norms. Don't Miss or Mr exist in Korean?

1
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

Here in North America we all call each other with our first names, no matter what's the rank or seniority!! You must have a super high rank (e.g. Prime Minister) to be called Sir, or Mam. But in SK even parents sometime call their children with their ranks, and last name used a lot (sometime mother call their little child using full last and 1st name)... So I guess using full 'last +1st name' does not have the same level of formality it has in other culture... Also it's very normal for them to call someone using their rank, even close families and friends...

4
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thank you all for the replies. I am not familiar with Korean norms as I said and it's good to get this background as it seems unique to Korea.

3

Iceland is a fascinating outlier, where everyone (including the Prime Minister) goes by first names. Generally, your last name is "son" or "dóttir" appended to your father's or mother's first name. Exceptions are for inherited non-Icelandic (immigrant) names. Can you imagine calling the Prime Minister or President of your nation by her/his first name?

4

Well, no, not in the same way. All languages and cultures have different norms, and while it may seem unusual, because their professional and personal relationships are intertwined it could be the formalities will stay in place longer.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm not satisfied with the reunion of Jae Yi's parents. Like why didn't her dad question what happened to his wife? Even if Jae Yi did tell him the truth (something that this drama didn't show), why there's no scene of her dad being furious at Judge Cha for what she did?

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

There is an excellent chance he would not believe his wife and daughter. He is an uber Moon-Sook Fanboy!

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Lol..."An uber Moon Sook fanboy"
You're right!
He even hit his daughter cos of her, so that is also possible...

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Just my quick note on ep 14, I don't think HJY is dumb enough to fall on AOJ threat and come to the most thug in CMS gang face to face. It wasn't the first time she did a harsh thing like this, it seems to me that she's never learned! I do understand that she doesn't want to get her family involved in her and BSP war, but that doesn't justify her irrational move. At least get Tae Kwang-So involved, he's BSP no 2 right? The same thing applied to BSP, he was just lost it when AOJ picks up HJY phone.
Yes, I know that they were the leads but that doesn't mean they can't be smarter.
Then again.... its heart overruled the head. I know that, but still.... it's cliche to me. We are down to last 2 episodes and I thought the writer can do better than this!

1
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

@xiupei - I believe that Jae-Yi did not fall for Oh-Joo's trap, but rather saw this as an opportunity to convince Oh-Joo to help them take Moon-Sook down. Her worse nightmare is for Sang-Pil and Oh-Joo to meet without her present. One of them would end up dead, which is a lose lose situation. She is the only possible voice of reason for those two testosterone driven fighting machines. Sang-Pil is Moon-Sook's perfect sword because he could NEVER work with Oh-Joo to take her down. Jae-Yi is the game changer. Jae-Yi also knows Sang-Pil would never let her go and that Oh-Joo wants Sang-Pil not her. She has made a calculated risk and put her faith in TEAM LAWLESS.

4
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, the preview clues hint at some kind of collaboration between AOJ and BSP. The fake death of one of them to throw CMS further off track. BSP's plan is presumably some grand denouement of CMS in court, in full glare of the media. Incriminating photos have barely scathed her, and HJI's mum turning up by herself to testify will barely do it. Her two former lackeys and Man Bae will have to come up with the goods. It will take hammer blow after hammer blow in court to bring down out villainess. I hope dirt is dished on her dad too, as that is a vulnerable point of hers.

3
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

For example, Moon-Sook's father wore lingerie under his judge's robes.

6
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

For starters. An awful birth secret - AOJ is her illegitimate half brother- and the revelation that both had a fling in their misbegotten youth?

3

Oh-Joo's threat against her father was an obvious bluff. Sang-Pil has Scorpion and his men protecting them. Oh-Joo's is on the run with very limited resources.

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

100% agree. "Jae-Yi is the game changer" and the only person who can actually makes a deal with AOJ. She made a deal with AOJ before, and she Knows very well that AOJ is not going to kill her when he needs both HJY and BSP to bring CMS down!! 'Enemies of your enemy are your best friends' when you're in a war...

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

@xiupei Actually I think Jae-Yi made such a smart move!! She learned her lesson and she's well aware that they cannot win against judge Cha only using "Law". They need every resources, even if it means she needs to make a deal with someone who practically killed both BSP's Mom and uncle... she is the only person who can make a deal with AOJ!

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Both Sang-Pil and Jae-Yi work within the law, but just barely. To do otherwise, would make them no better than the Seven.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Who is to blame for the terrible, amateurish scene cuts? A freeze-frame that stays on screen for more than a second. Why. It takes me out of the story. Grr.

1
9
reply

Required fields are marked *

Please forgive @persianrose and @pakalanapikake, it is all their fault.

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@ysbee ys
cc: @caeparius, @persianrose, @rukia

Dang! I am so sorry. The razor blade slipped when I was splicing the tape. I hate it when that happens.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

@rukia did her best to stop them, but she was unable.

3
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

Probably happened while I was setting up the defense perimeter around my home. I thought that @caeparius would be ensuring quality control....
Ahem.

3
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

@rukia caught me again, it is really my fault. @persianrose and @pakalanapikake are completely innocent of all bogus charges. Please have some tofu ready for when I get out.

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Bad @caeparius. #No TofuForYou.

2

cc: @ysbee ys, @caeparius, @persianrose

Hey, @rukia, you were only doing what you had to do. Until the day that you can say "Raise shields" against the Gnome Apocalypse, you'll have to secure your perimeters the old-fashioned way.

Um, where do you want me to park the trebuchet?

Psst, @persianrose, did you bring the pumpkins?

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

O.o

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sorry @ysbee it's all my fault for selling my commercials to tVN and luring everyone to watch LL, so they can see my commercials :))
Sidenotes: I read somewhere that tVN makes a whole lot of profits from intermission commercials of their weekend dramas!!

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I haven't watched Ep. 14 yet. Does anyone comment on Jae-yi's haircut? She looks fierce. If this were a sci-fi series, she'd have a shaved head for their last battle. (Think Ripley in Alien or Imperator Furiosa in Mad Max.)

3
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I think @tsutsuloo got the soju mixed up with the bottled water.

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

*hiccup*

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I agree. Love her new look. She looks a bit older too.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Beware of Spoilers

I'm in the midst of rewatching ep. 13 before seeing ep. 14 for the first time.

A couple of things jumped out at me this time around:

1) I realized at last that Gisung is Gotham City, and now the larger-than-life villains make sense to me. It hit me in ep. 13, @0:01:30, when we see Judge Cha at her seat in her empty courtroom as she hears from the chief prosecutor that Hizzoner is doomed. The lighting of the dark, panelled wall and emblems of the court above her and on the chairbacks suddenly struck me.

http://i630.photobucket.com/albums/uu26/dramabeans/drama/2016/MoonLovers/MoonLovers_11/moonlovers11-00600.jpg
[final image in MOON LOVERS ep. 11 recap]

2) I'm still wondering how Judge Cha learned that little Sang-pil escaped with his life. Was Samchoon's #2 already co-opted when the kid arrived on Unc's doorstep? Even back then?

3) Scorpion is #3. Samchoon told him to go to jail, and visited him there the day before he died to tell him to protect Sang-pil. Dae-woong obviously knew that his first mate was unreliable. He did what any smart person does: He kept his friends close, and his enemies closer.

4) The fix is in: Judge Cha tells Madam Nam to get rid of all her borrowed-name accounts, but to keep a few in Nam's and her daughter's names.

Is Nam stupid that she doesn't see that she and her prosecutor daughter are being set up to spend a lot of time in jail? No. Madam Nam is blinded by greed, and is so mesmerized by the prospect of wealth that she ignores the warning signs of betrayal.

"It will never happen to me."

She should be thinking: "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts."

Those accounts are a Trojan horse.

5) Hizzoner walks in on toady Seok Gwan-dong looting his safe, and is ready to shoot him. The terrified henchman tells his boss that he's playing into Sang-pil's plan to make the Mayor a murderer. What an inspired defense! This is exactly what Judge Cha does, but not Sang-pil.

I really think that Hizzoner was testing Gwan-dong, and scaring the crap out of him so he would not abandon him. He and Mr. Kim, his aid who's been on the lam since taking the fall for the murder blamed on Sang-pil, are the only two underlings who are still "loyal" to Mayor An Oh-ju.

Hizzoner's motivational methods are hair-raising.

* back to watching ep. 13 *

3
12
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I like the Gotham City metaphor @pakalanapikake https://goo.gl/images/g43fHt

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I never thought that Gwan-dong character can grow on me so much!! He is utterly dumb and terrible yet so reasonable at times!!! I heard Choi Dae-hoon is doing the majority of ad-libs in this drama!

3
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose,

I totally agree. Choi Dae-hoon is knocking it out of the ballpark with his obsequious toady routine. His little mannerisms, and the microexpressions that flit across his face, just slay me. His tones of voice, especially the wheedling ones, are daebak. What a great character actor. He makes me feel sympathy for this lunkhead who probably would have been a law-abiding oaf if he'd gotten a break or two earlier in life. Or maybe not. I've had a feeling that he's going to be a red shirt, but you never know.

Gwan-dong has grown on me, too. What especially got me was the scene in the getaway car with Secretary Kim when he tells Hizzoner that he should take care of his health. He's worried that his boss is ruining his health by smoking -- when Judge Cha has already unleashed the prosecutors on him. Now wonder Hizzoner throws a length of pipe at him. LOL. -- It was the utter sincerity in his voice that got me.

5
reply

Required fields are marked *

All the supporting characters are just great. AOJ, GD, GG and his sister who is just too adorable for words and even GS, whose loyalty and devotion is unquestionable. The only disappointing characters are HJI's parents and Ms Nam - I just cant stand her constant screaming.

3
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Almost every k-drama has a loud screaming character, this is another Mandatory Trope! The only reason I'm less annoyed with Ms Nam is Yum Hye-Ran brilliant portrayal of her character... She is a good actress...

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose,

Thank you for identifying another trope for the KDRAMA BINGO Trope List, which I have added on your behalf. At this time it is awaiting moderation. ;-)

It's in the same post with #122: Meta-reference to filming a drama under strand #17 in this comment thread:

http://www.dramabeans.com/2018/06/lee-je-hoon-chae-soo-bin-up-to-headline-sbss-fox-bride-star/#comment-3254488.

I agree with you about Yun Hye-ran's performance as Big Bad Wannabe Ms. Nam. She deftly projects superiority towards her perceived inferiors, subservient greed towards her master, and jealousy for status towards the other 7, mixed with maternal protectiveness and pride -- all underlain by niggling fear, then growing horror of betrayal by Judge Cha.

For some reason, perhaps the pitch of her voice, her hollering doesn't bother me as much as Hwang Jung-eum's did in the early episodes of THE UNDATEABLES before she toned it down.

3

Hi @persianrose. I am caught up and making my way through the comments. Thanks for the shout out for Choi Dae-hoon's performance as Suk Kwan-dong. He is right up there with some great kdrama weasels.

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, at first I thought Suk Kwan-dong is another K-Drama annoying characters that has no motivation other than jealousy! But I was 100% wrong! His character was quite interesting and a very good complement as Ahn Oh Ju's minion! Choi Dae-hoon's performance was so on point and natural with his unforgettable antics, and his unique ad-libs that were really fun to watch!

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

"I'm still wondering how Judge Cha learned that little Sang-pil escaped with his life".
I guess BSP's Mom death was in the news (= Gisung human right attorney committing suicide) but there was no news about her son death! Obviously Judge Cha (who is not a sloppy gangster like AOJ) did her research to find out where is BSP. As she was friend with attorney CJA, she probably knew about her gangster brother too, so it was not difficult for her to locate BSP!
Re uncle's #2 , uncle certainly was aware that he's betraying him and he's CMS's dog (his man might even killed him once CMS get to the point to destroy BSP) thus uncle went to Gisung without taking his #2! My guess is #2 started to work with CMS right after BSP passed the bar exam, he was so jealous of him (knowing that the gang might consider BSP as #2 instead of him)...

4
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Family Register? - After his mother's death, his uncle registered him under his name? As an officer of the court she would have access to private information and be able to search the family register.

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Was he registered under his name? Because they have different last names... here comes the old question: Who is Sang-Pil's father?! I hope they don't throw a birth secret in that last two episodes!!

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

2

Comment was deleted

2

@persianrose,

I've been wondering not only about Sang-pil's father... but also about Mr. Kang, father of the prosecutor. I shudder at that backstory. Madam Nam is such an unsympathetic harridan ($64 synonym for the b word) that I cannot imagine any normal human male doing anything but running away as fast as possible. That leaves two possibilities: (1) Ms. Nam bagged the unfortunate Mr. Kang on Sadie Hawkins Day, or (2), she's really a giant spider in disguise and devoured him after mating.

6

Ep. 13 -- Beware of Spoilers

1) Man, that Scorpion is one smooth operator. Talk about grace under pressure. As soon as I saw the barrel, I knew there was going to be a switcheroo. Maybe it was Sang-pil's attention to detail that made them bring bags of ballast to swap for the masseuse. But I loved how seamlessly Scorpion and his men pulled off the switch and hotfooted it to the dock before Hizzoner's crew could catch them.

2) When Scorpion eavesdropped on Samchoon's former #2 [Kwon Man-bae], I couldn't help but wonder if he had a way to secretly hack the surveillance system and send copies of incriminating evidence even more juicy than Madame Nam giving the order to whack Jae-yi's mom.

3) Famous Last Words Dep't.:
Judge Cha to Chief Prosecutor: "I am so relieved to have you at my side."

Translation from Cha-Speak: "I am so thrilled to have another oblivious stooge to throw under the bus. After I rob him of all his assets, of course."

4) I felt like barfing during the scene of Judge Cha filming her spiel about being drafted to serve as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Her pious claptrap about revising the law or whatever was said in a tone of voice that really got my goat. I'm just waiting for her to start peaking with the imperial we.

5) Did anyone notice how later closeups of Judge Cha are soft-focus? In one of them in her chambers, she was smiling to herself at how her cleaning house and getting rid of her opponents was going. In the past, the lighting and focus were hard and sharp-edged. I think it is signalling that she's losing focus, but I could be wrong. She's counting her chickens before they've hatched.

4
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

@pakalanapikake Let's talk about item #5 after you finish ep 14!

1
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose,

I'm caught up and finished watching ep. 14. -- And just finished ep. 6 of LIFE ON MARS, which is terrific.

Back to #5. What's your take on it?

0
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

your analysis about close-ups of Judge Cha is really an interesting take! She looked quite guarded and sometime even stressed through the first 11 episodes, but seemed to loosen gradually especially in episode 12... My theory is AOJ was such huge burden on her shoulders, the one who was really hard for her to get rid of, without BSP involvements! She started to feel more relaxed once she confirmed AOJ is finished! But she was totally wrong! She underestimated the dogs that she (and her family) raised and she especially BSP, HJY and Lawless Firm! Therefore we can see in episode 14 that she started to be on guard once again and quite furious this time...

3
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose,

My sense is that Judge Cha possesses keen insight into the motivations of a certain kind of person. She has surrounded herself with this type of person for most of her life. They are inferior “Mini Me” versions of herself, and all are motivated by materialism rather than love, honor, or true regard for the law, the nation, or its citizenry.

She has encountered only a few people who could not be bought off. Interestingly, both were mothers immensely devoted to their children. I don't think she ever met Samchoon in person. But I consider him on par with his sister in the maternal love department.

I think that Judge Cha is inherently incapable of loving another human being. Love would entail regarding the other as her equal, and she just ain't wired that way. Instead, I think that her only relationship is with power. She's not interested in money or fame per se, although I'm sure she enjoys the comfortable life they afford her. They are merely by-products of, and tools for, the acquisition and manipulation of power. In another universe, she would be a Ferengi.

If anything, she is a ruthless narcissist. Not to mention a megalomaniac. As she cleans house, it becomes abundantly clear that she has no one in her life who isn't beholden to her in some way.

Her version of maternal love is a bloodless parody of the real thing. She did not love Jae-yi. She merely attempted to steal, rather than kill or enslave, her enemy's heir. It's a scenario straight out of a sageuk.

Judge Cha's fatal flaw is that she is incapable of loving. She will never be able to grok the willingness of a lover to put the other's needs and highest good above his or her own desires. She will never understand how love enables Sang-pil and Jae-yi to support each other's quest for justice and judgment before the law rather than mere vigilante revenge.

4

@pakalanapikake - Spot On!
Your insight into her "material love" was excellent. I have been trying to say something similar for a long time. I have wasted so many words and you managed to say it in one sentence.

Her version of maternal love is a bloodless parody of the real thing.

3

@caeparius July 4, 2018 at 5:20 AM

Why, thank you!

Judge Cha is one of the best-developed villains to come down the Kdrama pike in a spell. She has an amazing ability to mesmerize friend and foe alike. Mother Theresa of Gisung somehow charms every single one of them into thinking that she won't throw them under the bus after they've repeatedly witnessed her doing exactly that to minions who screwed up -- or simply outlived their usefulness. Is she related to Hypnotoad, by any chance? Or maybe -- does she attract henchpeople with tremendous capacity to delude themselves? Or perhaps that's a side-effect of having one's conscience surgically removed. ;-)

Judge Cha is truly gifted when it comes to simulating care for others. I noticed that often when she expressed concern for another person, her words could be taken more than one way. She spoke with forked tongue.

The only material object that seemed to mean anything to her was her judge's robe. That was probably because it is one of the trappings of power. She can't seem to be bothered by mundane material stuff -- unlike The Material Girl. ;-)

Madam Nam, on the other hand, is one of these:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p-lDYPR2P8. ;-)

2

Ep. 13-14: Beware of Spoilers

During the scene in which Sang-pil takes Jae-yi to a house to meet her mother after Scorpion and his boys rescued her, I was ready to tear my hair out. Instead of meeting indoors, they stand around outside where anyone with good vantage point and a telescopic sight or telephone lens could see them. Dumb! Dumb! Dumb! It's like loitering in a crosswalk at night with your back to oncoming traffic. Sheesh.

Aside from that beef about potentially lax security, I was very glad when Mom told Jae-yi that she had sworn Sang-pil to secrecy, and also asked him to break up with her daughter to protect her.

Cue up Paul Simon (1972).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJmiIekAZXQ

The later reunion with Photog Dad was weird. Earlier I opined that he might have been in on Mom's leaving for Thailand (as evidenced by his not remarrying in the intervening 12 years). Perhaps he was in shock. Or hedging his bets until the final battle is over.

1
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

They seemed to be in a large lakeside garden, in a village...

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I should have been more specific and stated that Photog Dad's reunion with Missing Mom was weird because he didn't react when he saw her. There was zero emotional response that I could see.

That supports my earlier theory that Dad Ha might have known that Mom had gone into hiding. Think of the negatives she developed and had drying in the dark room. He could well have seen them, and known all along that she photographed something that could get her (and her whole family) killed. His not remarrying was another indicator that he knew she was still alive.

When we didn't see Photog Dad again for a bunch of episodes, I assumed that he could have been on vacation, aka in Scorpion's protective custody with Mom.

1
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Hi @pakalanapikake. I am caught up and making my way through the comments and decided to stop in here.
I thought all the reunions with Mom were strange. I commented earlier on the lack of emotion at the BSP-Mom reunion. During the HJY-Mom reunion I kept thinking well, what about Dad your husband. I agree with you about the weirdness in the Dad-Mom reunion after 18 years.
At times I got the feeling that Dad knew Mom was still living and he was putting on a bit of an act being obsequious toward Judge Cha.

1
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Good to see you on the 4th of July, @marcusnyc20 Bong-soo! It's been rather quiet around here, but not because the finale was a bust. On the contrary, it was a good one. I'm just flagging a bit after live-watching. I'm still up to my eyeballs in dramas, and even ended up adding ARE YOU HUMAN TOO, which is turning out to be a lot of fun, and a bit reminiscent of DUEL, what with the charming robot impersonating the incapacitated chaebol.

Back to Gisung and those strangely unemotional reunions with Jae-yi's Mom. The only explanation that makes sense to me is that Photog Dad knew all along that she was doing something dangerous and might have to split at the drop of a hat, although we never see them acknowledge it that I can recall. His klutzy fanboying over Judge Cha was just protective coloration. Maybe after 18 years of hiding, it still has yet to sink in that the nightmare is nearly over. Or perhaps they are loathe to jinx their happily ever after, and prefer to wait until Judge Cha has been dethroned to start singing, "Ding, dong, the witch is dead!" ;-)

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Lol: "Ding, dong, the witch is dead!"

2

@pakalanapikake Re Post #173 : I like this idea that Judge Cha's minions are motivated by materialism and greed! They're not necessarily out-of-this-world smart people: with dark background or artificial motivations... they're just acquisitive people who see money above any morality...

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

LAWLESS LAWYER EPISODES 15 & 16 (FINAL) MARKER

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Episode 15 – Beware of Spoilers

Part 1 of 3

Episode 15 opens up with Attorney Ha Jae-yi in the clutches of Hizzoner An O-joo and henchman Seok Gwan-dong. When lawyer Bong Sang-pil roars up to rescue her, the mayor pulls a gun on him and is ready to plug him. In a room nearby, Jae-yi listens with growing alarm and finally tramples over Gwan-dong to stop O-joo from shooting her partner. She reveals the memo book Judge Cha used to sic her former friend's son on the mayor. Hizzoner is agog at the revelations until he regains his presence of mind and moves on to the mandatory fight scene, which is very nicely choreographed.

The bare-knuckle fisticuffs reveals that Hizzoner's no-holds-barred street-fighting moves give him the edge over Sang-pil, at least in the beginning. He's bigger and stockier than the nimble lawyer, whom he repeatedly tosses through the air without breaking a sweat. Decades of thuggery have perfected his headbutts, eye-gouging, and other unsporting tricks. It has also toughened his hide and raised his pain threshold.

During the break following round one, Gwan-dong ministers to his boss by fanning him, giving him water, and generally carrying on like Rocky Balboa's manager (memorably played by Burgess Meredith). The only thing missing is hearing Choi Min-soo hollering “Adrian!”

Round two resumes. Eventually Sang-pil whacks him with his own nameplate from city hall. (Is that how his left forearm fractures, or does it snap later during their death grapple on the floor?) Jae-yi manages to persuade Sang-pil to refrain from choking his opponent to death. A vanquished Hizzoner mulls over whether to testify at Madam Nam's trial, with the understanding that the prosecution will rescind his all-points-bulletin. As Jae-yi drives them back to the office, Sang-pil notes that the former mayor has only two options: to take the fall for Judge Cha, or to take her (and retroactively, her father) with him.

Back at the office, Geum Gang & Co. demonstrate their rousing cheer for Judge Moon to the attorneys. It's hilarious – and Geum Gang has a great singing voice. The Lawless Team's contribution to the demonstration exhorting Judge Cha to accept the appointment as chief justice apparently pays off as news of her upcoming confirmation hearing breaks. In a related matter, several members of The 7 support her presiding over Madam Nam's trial as her final case in Gisung. The party leader does, too. When that news airs, the defendant freaks out and calls Sang-pil to meet in jail.

- Continued -

2
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Nice recap 😉

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I believe that during the AOJ-BSP fight this was the first time BSP used an object (the nameplate) to defend himself or rather inflict harm on an opponent. @pakalanapikake I think you emphasized throughout that BSP's only weapon was his body. Once again a great fight. Excellent description.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@marcusnyc20,

Thanks for the reminder that Sang-pil previously only defended himself. He had to go on the offensive against Hizzoner just to keep from getting killed. Since it was self-defense, it was legal, but I think it shows just how closely matched they were. Sang-pil could not afford to cling to his high ideals when up against a wily, amoral street-fighter. Hizzoner hadn't survived for decades by playing by the rules.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Episode 15 – Beware of Spoilers

Part 2 of 3

I like the strategy to bring Jae-yi to court as co-counsel. Madam Nam's discomfort at facing her daughter's rival is proof that it could bring pressure to parties who still have a vestigial conscience. I would not include Judge Cha in that population, to be honest. I think she's a sociopath who is incapable of any emotional connection with other life forms. But every little bit of unexpected pressure or weirdness may prove to be useful in ruffling the judge's feathers. – It is also good to learn that Jae-yi is going after Cha and not wasting time or energy on her self-appointed #1 Henchperson.

Contrast that scene with the next one, in which Prosecutor Kang meets with her mentor to plead for her help with her mother's case. Judge Cha coldly tells Kang that her mother has to face the music for the serious crimes she committed. When Kang protests that Madam Nam would be taking the fall for things she did not do, Cha tells her that as a public figure, she herself cannot become embroiled in the misfortunes of her colleagues. If she wants to stay by her mentor's side (and later get stabbed in the back just like Mom – just sayin'), she has to convince her mother to take the fall and do her time in jail.

To be honest, it serves Prosecutor Kang right. Her greed for money and power, which apparently is hereditary, got her involved in The 7. Actually, I think that was Cha's insurance policy all along. She's got plenty of leverage against both mother and daughter. I fully expect that Kang will eventually be disbarred for her association with The 7, especially when the Prosecution's forensic auditors get their hands on the borrowed-name accounts that Madam Nam kept in her and her daughter's names at Judge Cha's urging. With Kang a known protege of the Crookedest Judge in Gisung, I'm betting that every case she prosecuted will have to be retried.

With all the double-crossing in the air, I can't help but wonder about the party leader who stabbed Judge Cha's father in the back. Will she have the chutzpah to pull him down when she falls, or has he insulated himself sufficiently? Is it possible that he's egged her on by dangling the Chief Justice position in front of her while being fully aware of her misdeeds? Has he been giving her enough rope to hang herself until the inevitable infighting breaks out among her underlings? Will the biggest fish get away?

- Continued -

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Episode 15 – Beware of Spoilers

Part 3 of 3

I love straight-arrow Prosecutor Chun Seung-bum to pieces. He rescinds the APB [all points bulletin] so that An O-joo can appear in court as a witness. What a great “in your face!” moment when he tells off the Chief Prosecutor and refuses to accept his undocumented evidence of illegal campaign contributions against Hizzoner. He doesn't mess around, and is refreshingly immune to graft, bribery, and other forms of corruption. He must be Teflon-coated or something. Kudos to Park Ho-san for projecting a stalwart, incorruptible image.

Hats off to Samchoon's faithful second mate, Scorpion, who continues to loyally support Sang-pil in his campaign against Judge Cha. I think he is played by Kim Yong-woon (b. 1976), judging from the extended cast photos at HanCinema.

Hizzoner's face-to-face meeting with Judge Cha was full of warm fuzzies. Not. Her statement that he would end up obeying her commands was the dumbest thing anyone could have said to a ruthless gangster, especially one who is cornered. It just goes to show how convinced she is of her superiority, as if it's some kind of privilege for mere mortals to be ordered around by her. I can't wait for her to get her comeuppance.

What is in that message that is passed to Madam Nam in the clink? A little love note from Hizzoner? Gloating by one of The 7? I doubt it is a message from Judge Cha, her daughter, or her lawyers, all of whom normally speak with her in person.

At the launch party for her humbly-titled autobiography, Lady Justice, Judge Cha holds forth in such a sanctimonious tone of voice I want to scream. Sheesh. I'm glad we're nearing the end of the show because I don't think I can take much more of this claptrap. Later, at dinner with bigwigs and justices, Congressman Park hits a tender nerve when he brings up the photos from 18 years ago. I'm glad that someone recalls them.

Madam Nam dramatically keels over as she's about to testify. Did someone slip her a mickey? Is she faking it? Does it have something to do with that note she received the previous night?

I've been wondering where Hizzoner's Secretary Kim has been hiding out. Surprise, surprise. He's been in cahoots with Judge Cha all along. I should have seen that coming.

What I did have a correct inkling of was haplessly mercenary Seok Gwan-dong meeting a grisly end. Although he was still sticking around for financial reasons, the doofus remained loyal to Hizzoner. He was one of my favorite baddies. Maybe if he'd had a mom like Sang-pil's or Jae-yi's, he would have gotten off to a better start in life. As it was, he died a hero's death while trying to protect his boss. In Gisung, that's about as good as it gets for people in his line of work. Thank you, Choi Dae-hoon, for bringing the lovable scamp to life.

-30-

3
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Re: last paragraph. Thank you @pakalanapikake for the nice eulogy for Suk Kwan-dong.

As it was, he died a hero's death while trying to protect his boss. In Gisung, that's about as good as it gets for people in his line of work.

One of my favorite scenes of Gwan-dong was almost at the end when he was shooting hoops and betting with AOJ. Talk about strange given the circumstances.
When he sank that 3-pointer he was like a 13 year old. That even got a little bit of a smile from AOJ.
(Sidebar. I would love to see the outtakes on that scene.)

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@marcusnyc20 Bong-soo,

Yes, I loved that basketball scene, too. It was a surreal moment of innocent fun in the eye of the storm. When Gwan-dong lost the previous bet, Hizzoner lent him the money for the final bet, which he won.

You're absolutely correct -- the Cringing Toady looked like a triumphant 13-year-old. He probably never had that much fun at that age. And it only made his demise that much more poignant.

I bet the BTS of the basketball scene was a hoot. Especially if/when Choi Min-soo sauntered over to show him how it's done. ;-)

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Series Review

Lawless Lawyer (Lawless Attorney) was extremely thrilling to watch as it maintained the same pace and kept us on the edge until the last episode. Though we knew the identity of the killers from the very 2nd episode there was not a single scene that was boring throughout the series.

If you want to watch an action-packed series with elements of humour and romance and that has a happy ending then I would highly recommend watching this series.

The storyline is really thrilling with a lot of twists and conspiracies. The action scenes are swift and a treat to watch while the trial scenes are gripping. This is one of the few series that does not have a second lead in it and I liked that about it. The Chemistry between the leads is a delight to watch and the romance track is matured and steady throughout the series. The humour aspects of the series are well blended into the main plotline and are a welcome change when the plot gets too serious. It has the right blend of legal, action, humour and romance in it.

Every character is well written and the casting is perfect as everyone has done a great job with their roles.My favourite characters from this series were, without doubt, Bong Sang Pil and Ahn Oh Ju.

Lee Joon Gi has done full justice to his role, Bong Sang Pil- the Lawless Lawyer. He is amazing as he portrays the character, which requires him to constantly switch between being a brilliant lawyer, a skilled thug, a romantic lover and a determined avenger.

Ahn Oh Ju portrayed by Choi Min Soo tops my list of favourite negative characters by far. Choi Min Soo’s brilliant portrayal of Ahn Oh Ju makes us hate Oh Ju and at the same time feel for him. This character possesses dark humour and he has a dynamic personality. Though he is a formidable thug, he is exceedingly loyal to the Judge family until the very end. He gives an indomitable look and he is the responsible for bringing out Sang Pil’s full potential.

I enjoyed watching this series as it exceeded my expectations as it started with a bang and finished in a flash. Thank you Team Lawless Lawyer and TVN for giving us this wonderful series that we can re-watch umpteen number of times!

Source:https://thewritersroomchennai.in/2018/07/02/lawless-lawyer-recap-episode-16-series-finale/

9
16
reply

Required fields are marked *

EXCELLENT Review! I would add that actresses portraying both Jae-Yi and Moon-Sook were also among my personal favorites. All four actresses and actors made this K-Drama a must watch. I have actually avoided posting, because subconsciously it would be acknowledging this K-Drama has ended. We can only hope that the next K-Drama is of similar quality and provides just as must entertainment value.

5
15
reply

Required fields are marked *

Certainly @caeparius , this drama exceeded my expectations in many levels, and one of the most important aspect was woman power: Jae-Yi and Moon-Sook, one as a brave woman who cannot tolerate any injustice, and the other as a corrupted sociopath judge with with no conscience. They were both excellent at their respective roles!!

6
reply

Required fields are marked *

It's really difficult for me to accept that this K-Drama has ended, and looking at the current and upcoming dramas, I might be in drama slump for while!!

4
13
reply

Required fields are marked *

Was that really necessary? I was trying to pretend that another "good" K-Drama was just around the corner. Please do not be so quick to destroy someones hopes with a dose of reality.

4
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I don't usually like medical dramas, but the previous drama by Lee Soo-yeon (screenwriter) was pretty good, so here is some hope for us: http://www.dramabeans.com/2018/07/a-battle-of-principles-in-jtbcs-medical-drama-life/

3

YOU CAN'T UNBREAK AN EGG!

I appreciate the effort, but I can never go back to naively hoping for a "good" follow up K-Drama. It is just too painful.

2

When "Prime Time" K-Dramas are just too painful to watch, I sometimes take the Attack of the Killer Tomatoes! (1978) approach to viewing. The above is a cult classic science fiction movie that is so bad that it is a fun watch. Makjang family K-Dramas can serve as a good stop gap between "real" K-Dramas. They are often so bad that they are really funny. The key is a judicious use of the fast forward button. I usually find that one or two of the side stories are interesting, so I make them the focus of my viewing pleasure. I seem to be able to get almost as much or more entertainment out of a creatively condensed 120 episode K-Drama as the average 16 episode "real" K-Dramas. I have also found the quality of Chinese Dramas [C-Dramas] high enough to make them a viable option. Unfortunately, I have had bad experiences with Taiwanese Dramas [T-Dramas]. They may start out strong, but all seem to go off into the weeds by the three-quarter mark. It would be a mistake to not mention Japanese Dramas [J-Dramas], they are often very entertaining. However, they can also be extremely bizarre.

NOTE: IMHO spoken Korean is a very pleasant language to listen too. I only understand a few words, but really enjoy the sound, tone and emotions of the actors.

3
9
reply

Required fields are marked *

I recently noticed the high quality of C-Dramas, and since I really missed watching a period drama, I decided to watch Nirvana in Fire! However I really had difficulty with language that made me unable to follow the subs and focus!! I really want to keep watching but I don't know how?!

2

An excellent Chinese movie is "Finding Mr. Right". I have watched it several times and highly recommend it. You will especially enjoy it if you are a fan of the movie "When Harry Met Sally".

2

I have a hard time with period K-Dramas. Even when they are of the romantic comedy genre, several people get murder tortured and beheaded. The more serious the storyline the worse it gets. Watching the news is often more light-hearted.

1

If you are looking for a silly, really fun watch "My Amazing Boyfriend", might be a good fit. It is technically well made [camera work], but never really takes itself seriously. The female lead is a hoot, she seems to be really enjoying her role. It will not win any prizes for writing or acting, but I enjoyed it. It has a bit of a "My Love from the Star" vibe to it.

1

@caeparius,

I share your sentiments re: listening to spoken Korean and reading subtitles. Dubbing just doesn't do it for me.

ATTACK OF THE KILLER TOMATOES -- now that's a classic. I once visited Gilroy, California, The Garlic Capital of the World, during the tomato harvest. From the highway we could see mechanized tomato pickers directing streams of tomatoes into strings of open wagons for delivery to the nearby cannery. As one of the wagon trains was hauled up an exit ramp to an overpass, some of the love apples failed to negotiate the curve and fell (or jumped!) off and rolled down the ramp, just like in the movie. Luckily they were neutralized by valiant Vehicles Of Doom, so Gilroy was spared their depredations.

Another great cult classic: PLAN NINE FROM OUTER SPACE. Or anything by Ed Wood, especially if you groove to alien space ships that resemble 1950s hubcaps. MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER is a good bet, too. ;-)

2

Beanies who decide to watch "Finding Mr. Right" or "My Amazing Boyfriend", please let me know what you think. I would enjoy reading your opinions.

1

@persianrose,
I know this is out of the blue, but did you ever watch Finding Mr Right? I rewatched it over the weekend and decided to check back with you.

1

I haven't watched it yet @caeparius
Possibly this coming weekend! I'll let you know...

1

Please do, I would really like to get your opinion. Just because I really liked it I always assume everyone else will too, but it is better to know the truth. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

1

And on a personal note, I would like to proudly announce that I am now: EUNUCH in DRAG!

5
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Congratulations, @caeparius!

Offhand, I can think of only two Eunuchs In Drag (in MOONLIGHT DRAWN BY CLOUDS and SUNGKYUNKWAN SCANDAL), but I haven't watched the latter. What an achievement. ;-)

0
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

My beanie level is now at EUNUCH in DRAG based on the number of posts that I have written.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Honestly I was quite dissapointed when I promoted to EUNUCH in DRAG (because I absolutely HATE that drama trope)... So I increased my activity significantly last month and thankfully I am now a Chaebol Poor Doppelganger 😁

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

In addition to Lawless Lawyer, I'm going to miss your comments @caeparius

2
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

Do you know something that I do not? Have I been marked for a "swim with the fishes"? Which might not be all bad considering it would be a trip to the beach. My family has unsuccessfully been trying to get rid of me for year [Reference: Periodic DNA Testing]. I am remarkable resilient, getting "away" from me is much more difficult than you think. I will add that I have little interest in the K-Dramas that are currently being recapped. We may need to hijack another thread for our own nefarious purposes.

2
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

"I have little interest in the K-Dramas that are currently being recapped"... Me too, I tried really hard to watch WWWSK but failed miserably!!

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Speaking of hijack, congratulations @caeparius for presiding over this thread (certainly not in the style of Judge Cha Moon-sook) which has topped over one thousand comments.
You taught us along the way about
PARENT posts and CHILD posts and a lot more.
Thank you very much.

3
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thank you for that excellent compliment! I certainly learned as much or more as I might have accidentally taught. My brain is full of trivia and sometimes it comes in handy. For example, I know the full lyrics to the Gilligan's Island theme song. Not many can claim that and even fewer would want too.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Manseh! I second your sentiments, @marcusnyc20 Bong-soo, and @persianrose.

Like an energetic border collie, @caeparius has done a dandy job of shepherding the LAWLESS ATTORNEY discussion thread. It was no mean feat, especially when you consider that the thread's denizens habitués are scattered around the globe, speak numerous native languages, and are a diverse sample of humanity. Yet the conversations have always been cordial, warm, respectful, civil... and left a conspiratorial vibe lingering in the digital air. Oh, and at times they've been ridiculous. Can't leave out ridiculous. We might take our Kdrama seriously, but not so seriously that we can't crack ourselves up from time to time. (This is what sets DramaBeans apart from English Literature class.)

Even when we've been goofing around, the signal-to-noise ratio has been high. Maybe a little too stratospheric when it comes to trivia -- but what's a little off-topic shooting of the breeze when it's taking place on a "borrowed-name" thread, to use Madam Nam's money-laundering parlance? ;-)

It has been a pleasure to hang out with such astute Kdrama fans. The theorizing, sleuthing, and analysis of plot, characters & their motivations, etc., etc., has been fun. Thank you, @caeparius, for stirring the pot to keep things interesting. Here's hoping our paths cross again in another DB thread. ;-)

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

It was interesting how Judge Cha kept saying that those who commit crimes should be punished but easily overlooked the cold-blooded murder that she had committed with her own hands!! It makes me wonder when she was saying that line every time she felt that she couldn't get away with her own crimes and that she will be punished one day!! She was such twisted character!

6
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@ljgangel Stranger,

The irony of Judge Cha's condemnation of others while giving herself a free pass for cruelly murdering someone who merely voiced disrespect for her father leaves me wondering why her robes didn't have rust stains. Sheesh! What really killed me was the pious tone she used while pontificating. Arg!!

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sang Pil and Jae Yi shared great chemistry as partners within the courtroom!! The trial scene where both of them interrogated Han and then Cha was super well made! Although this drama had only a few court scenes (considering that it was tagged as legal drama, there were not many), but all the courtroom scenes were so unconventional and thrilling!

6
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I totally agree "the courtroom scenes were so unconventional and thrilling"! The few last courtroom scenes were like an intense game of chess with both Sang Pil and Jae Yi making their well-calculated moves to defeat Judge Cha!!

5
reply

Required fields are marked *

@ljgangel Stranger, @persianrose,

I agree that LJG and Seo Ye-ji -- and Lee Hye-young -- had splendid chemistry in the courtroom scenes as they jousted with logic and legal statutes. It says something that the lawless attorneys had to double-team the presiding judge during trials -- and outside the courtroom as well.

Park Ho-san lent a grounded presence as the incorruptible Prosecutor Chun Seung-bum. In the playground of corruption that was Gisung, he was that rarest of unicorns, an honest and upright prosecutor. Hell must have frozen over.

Judge Cha remained a formidable opponent to the bitter end. What ultimately tripped her up was her inability to understand motivations that were so far removed from her own. But that look on her face as Madam Nam harangued her in prison... made me wonder how long it will be before she orders someone to whack her. Like a rattlesnake that can fatally bite even after it has been beheaded, I wouldn't provoke the trussed-up tigress. On the other hand, Nam was paying her back with interest, and establishing her dominance behind bars.

Back to the OTP's chemistry. The drama's focus was on their joint quest to bring Gisung's baddies to justice, so the romance was actually pretty much a done deal. We got reminders of it periodically, courtesy of the Lawless Law Firm cheerleaders' busting of chops and carefully-timed intrusions. The icing on the cake was hearing Sang-pil and Jae-yi spouting aegyo at each other in front of the minions. Hilarious. As they drove off to join Prosecutor Chun in Seoul, I could foresee them taking many a romantic stroll along the Han while discussing their cases. ;-)

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Great summary as always @pakalanapikake! you should start writing drama recaps 😉

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose,

Aw, shucks. Thanks for the compliment. I'm not disciplined enough to write to a deadline, so I'll just have to stay in the Beanut Gallery. ;-)

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Do they give drama awards for best villains? At the very least, I hope this show wins for one of best cast awards.

I applaud Lee Hye-young’s icy performance as Cha Moon-sook. When she murdered the union rep with her car and cooly told her “dog”, “You did this,” it was clear there was no redemption in her future. I can only imagine all the people she hurt throughout her life.

In the final court scene, was CMS referring to herself in third person because of court protocols or because she’s off her damn rocker? I would’ve enjoyed another scene of Nam Soon-ja making prison life miserable for Moon-sook.

Choi Min-soo pretty much stole the show for me, as An Oh-joo. He’s the king amongst rogues, even as a disheveled heap slumped next to a suitcase of burning money. His physicality sticks with me—the drawl, the swagger, his wide stance, the way his tongue rolled against his cheek. (I’m waiting for a good chunk of time to do a supercut of all that tongue probing!) Leaving on his own terms made sense for this character.

As @ljgangel noted on their fan wall Ha Jae-yi is a woman absolutely worthy of a girl crush. I hope this role brings more meaty roles for Seo Ye-ji. Her character’s fierceness, intelligence, and warmth make her #kdramagoals. I love her.

And I really loved this OTP. In my short time watching K-dramas, I’ve never seen anything like it and I was grateful to see a (very handsome) couple find mature love and support in each other—while forging a true partnership. While I’d hoped for another smooch, I’m content to see our Lawless Lawyers continue their romance and partnership in Seoul.

It’s a blast spending time with you Beanies on the hijacked thread!

*shifting my gaze towards Life on Mars*

7
26
reply

Required fields are marked *

As much as I adore Choi Min Soo and Lee Hye-young performances and their unique characters in this drama, we should not overlook our main hero! Lee Jun Ki also offered such a solid performance, switching between cunning and seriousness, cheerful and traumatized, as well as his signature ‘all-out’ action performance without any stunt! Korean media called it a "Glorious Return" for him and I partly agree as he had a few underrated dramas in a row...

8
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

True! We as audiences tend to praise the unique characters, while sometime we overlook solid acting (because the characters have not written as catching)! I don't think anybody can deny Lee Jun Ki's solid performance in this drama! In addition, he shared such a great chemistry with every single cast that made their performances even more eye-catching!!

5
reply

Required fields are marked *

Agreed. He was a perfect lead in a brilliant ensemble.

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

brilliant ensemble...

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose,

It was truly a treat to see Lee Joon-gi again in a solid vehicle worthy of his talents that kept right on rolling until the very end. "Glorious Return" is apt indeed. He is a terrific and hard-working actor who makes his co-stars shine. His stunts and fight choreography is topnotch. Here's hoping we get to see him in a swashbuckling sageuk soon. Perhaps as an epic villain? ;-)

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose. Thank you for all your comments and observations. This was my first Lee Joon-gi drama.
I thought he was terrific as Bong Sang-pil. His physicality in this drama was incredible. For me in toto of all the kdramas I have seen LAWLESS LAWYER contains the best fight scenes for a series. LJG took that part of his role very seriously. Check out LJG's Instagram account and you will see his love for jiu jitsu.
I really will have to try to work in this summer TIME BETWEEN DOG AND WOLF (2007). It was directed by LL's PD Kim Jin-min (who also directed PRIDE AND PREJUDICE) and has as one of the leads Jung Kyung-ho.
I will just have to prepare myself to see these actors 11 years younger.

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I highly recommend TBDAW (2007)... You should keep an open mind because it's older drama (slower pace and less stylish cinematography) but the story is thrilling and unpredictable... with so many intresting charachters and super adorable beromance/enemance... I also highly recommend Two Weeks

6
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for the confirmation. Unfortunately TBDAW is not available on Viki or DF (which has quite an extensive back catalogue). It is available however on my go to *alternate* site (the one ending ice.io).

1

@persianrose I was blown away by the transforming craft of the true actor is Lee Joon-gi. His commitment to his roles are so admirable. I heard he learned Jujutsu for this drama and lost weight to better show the painful past of BSP and his cunning nature! Kudos to him! I am looking forward to his new projects, while I'm planning to watch all his past dramas.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

@tsutsuloo,

Thanks for a great summation, Counsellor Tsutsuloo!

In the final court scene, was CMS referring to herself in third person because of court protocols or because she’s off her damn rocker?

I'll bet a dollar to doughnuts that she was using the "royal we." She is thoroughly convinced that she is The Law in Gisung. All through the drama she has used a certain tone of voice while making her edicts pronouncements. I don't understand Korean, but have a sense that she's using her own special brand of sageuk speech to set herself above all the insignificant little ants scurrying around under her feet. It has grated on me repeatedly as she pontificates, whether from the bench or in a minion's face.

Choi Min-soo was phenomenal as An O-joo. He called to mind the celebrated Edward G. Robinson as Rico in LITTLE CAESAR -- crossed with Sylvester Stallone's Rocky Balboa -- then soaked in soju and kimchi with a side of Clint Eastwood's DIRTY HARRY. Hizzoner was truly the larger-than-life personification of Gisung.

An O-joo would not have been complete without his simpering minion, Seok Gwan-dong. Choi Dae-hoon was terrific as his hapless toady who was as motivated by money as The 7, but was way more loyal, even to the death. They made a great Mutt-and-Jeff pair of baddies.

Thanks to you and all the Beanies whose comments have made watching LAWLESS ATTORNEY such fun. It has been an honor to compare notes with you. ;-)

LIFE ON MARS is another show with engaging characters and intriguing mysteries. ARE YOU HUMAN TOO is surprisingly engaging, with a robot who is more human(e) than many of the "humans." I've been glued to the excellent COME HERE AND HUG ME, another glimpse into the dark aspects of human nature. SKETCH has been keeping me on my toes. (I'm balancing them out with a passel of lighter fare, too.)

3
14
reply

Required fields are marked *

@pakalanapikake. As always it was a lot of fun watching LL with you and the rest of the beanies who hung out here. You gave me plenty of laugh out loud moments. Except for SKETCH I am live watching the 3 dramas mentioned above. I am sure I will bump into you again over at LIFE ON MARS.
I am also watching WOK and I did a quick check and I think for the 4 dramas I am 10 hours behind so I really have some catching up to do over the next few days.

1
13
reply

Required fields are marked *

@marcusnyc20 Bong-soo,

Our impromptu DIY "secret clubhouse" for discussing LAWLESS ATTORNEY gave us Beanies a place to hang our hats and compare notes. It has been great fun. I'm glad you got a chuckle out of my comments. ;-)

I'm also watching WOK OF LOVE, along with:

MISS HAMMURABI
ABOUT TIME (finale this week)
HANDSOME GUY
WHAT'S WRONG WITH SECRETARY KIM
SHALL WE LIVE TOGETHER
MR. SUNSHINE (starts this weekend).

Live-watching 11 shows may be a record for me. Yikes. ;-)

4
12
reply

Required fields are marked *

WOW! @pakalanapikake. I would like to watch MR. SUNSHINE but I think I am going to pass.
It is scheduled as a 24 episode drama produced by tvN. I haven't been able to nail the length of the episodes (maybe you know) but for some reason I think they will be 90 minutes which is common on tvN. I think that is too much for me right now.

1

@marcusnyc20 Bong-soo July 5, 2018 at 8:18 AM

Here's hoping that MR. SUNSHINE's episodes are shorter than 90 minutes or I may be a goner. HWAYUGI's were pretty long, and almost did me in. On the other hand, if the drama is a good, compelling one, duration may not matter. I'm intrigued with the historical aspect, so it has a lot going for it already. I've watched a number of dramas with 50+ episodes (e.g., SIX FLYING DRAGONS and HWAJUNG / SPLENDID POLITICS), so that doesn't faze me if it's a good production with a solid cast. A couple of finales are coming up, too, so that will help. ;-)

1

SHALL WE LIVE TOGETHER

Eun-Tae is Eun-Soo's biological father. He was the anonymous sperm donor. Yoo-Ha's ex-husband recognized him right away and was very concerned about him being near his ex-wife and child. This is how the "makjang hag" [ie Eun-Tae's sister] will ultimately get shutdown.

1

@pakalanapikake, Re Mr. Sunshine: "I'm intrigued with the historical aspect".
I never finished any of other dramas with this writer, and I'm not quite fond of the lead actors, but I'm starved to watch a period drama and I especially like that era! The only drama that I was fine with 90 min long episodes was Reply 88, because it had too many characters...

4

@caeparius July 5, 2018 at 9:24 AM

Oh, cool, you're also watching MARRY ME NOW?.

I figured that Eun-tae could be Eun-soo's biological father when they had the same rare blood type. Which means that Eun-soo has a bunch of half-siblings.

I can't wait to see the look on the face of Sister-In-Law From Hell when she learns that the good doctor is the biological father of her brother's child. In your face, toots!

0

@pakalanapikake,

No, that would be out of character. It was a one time deal to help a troubled Korean couple. My guess when he was a medical student in the US. Eun-Tae does not have the ego to be a regular sperm donor, but he can not resist helping people in need.

1

I post about Marry Me Now? [Shall We Live Together] on DramaCool via DISQUS. My alias is also "caeparius".

1

Comment was deleted

1

@caeparius July 5, 2018 at 11:53 AM

Oh, right. They were in the US when they did the in vitro fertilization. I assumed Eun-tae was a med student. Maybe there will be other juicy details that ramp up the makjang even more.

I wonder how his noona is going to react. The revelation will probably blow her doors off. I can't abide her misguided strong-arm efforts to marry him off after he's already told her he loves someone.

0

@pakalanapikake

The Makjang Hag has a point. He is only a doctor who makes life and death decision almost everyday. He regularly visits war areas to treat patients in need. He is a grown man. He has saved hundreds of lives with his decision and medical skills.

She however, has married a man who is an amoral, unethical businessman. Who looks to take advantage on everyone he meets, even his own brother-in-law. She has led a sheltered life, with almost no worries. He most important decision of the day, is what to select from her wardrobe. Does it match and make the proper statement?

She thinks she knows what is best for everyone, but does not even know what is best for herself [ie divorce]. She will make Eun-Tae an even more famous person by driving him back into danger so he can die a "Hero Doctor". She just wants him to succeed.

1

@caeparius July 5, 2018 at 1:00 PM

Duh. I misread "Makjang Hag" as being Yoo-ha's Sister-In-Law-From Hell, rather than Eun-tae's Noona From Hell.

I agree that Noona's life is totally screwed up, and that divorcing her horrid husband would be a good place to start.

1

Wow, you're watching too many dramas @pakalanapikake !!
It will probably take me time to snap out of Lawless Lawyer and move on to a new drama! :-)

4

@ljgangel Stranger
July 5, 2018 at 3:08 PM

Yeah, I am watching a passel of Kdramas at the moment. Embarrassing but true. I officially don't have a life, but it keeps me out of trouble. ;-)

2

Excellent observations @tsutsuloo. LAWLESS LAWYER had 2 great villains in Judge Cha Min-sook and ex-Mayor Ahn Oh-joo. This was my first Lee Hye-young drama and she was fantastic. This was my second Choi Min-soo drama (the first was PRIDE AND PREJUDICE) and he was also fantastic. I agree with you and mentioned earlier that CMS was stealing every scene he was in. Little thing but I had to laugh. I think AOJ used the famous notebook to push his glasses up.
I will see you over at LIFE ON MARS.

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@marcusnyc20 Bong-soo,

I caught that scene when Hizzoner used the Notebook That Started It All to push up his eyeglasses. What a great gesture. It was so him.

And then he used his teeth to tear the notebook apart after Sang-pil broke his arm... Nothing could stop him. He literally fought tooth-and-nail -- which was the only way he could hope to best Judge Cha.

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

@persianrose, if you're looking for C-dramas without too much of a time commitment, I second @caeparius's recommendation of Finding Mr. Right. Tang Wei is so beautiful and very good here. Wu Xiubo is one of my silver fox biases.

There's also a "sequel" film called Finding Mr. Right 2/Book of Love featuring the same actors with a completely different story line. It's an epistolary romance inspired by 22 Charing Cross Road. Technically, they have less screen time together but they still make a really deep connection. Very satisfying. (Had to find elsewhere on the interwebs. *cough*)

Dramafever also has Tang Wei's fluffy Only You, a Chinese remake of the 1994 film with Marisa Tomei and Robert Downey, Jr. Her co-star is Liao Fan, who's not pretty like Korean actors but still thuggishly alluring and very fit.

I lurved Wu Xiubo Uncle Stylish! in the 46-part C-drama Divorce Lawyers. There are a lot of irritating characters in that series so I used recaps to help me sift through the stupid parts. WX and his glorious hair have stellar chemistry with Yao Chen and it's a blast watching them evolve from professional adversaries, to neighbors, to friends, to lovers. (Honestly, though, that series could've been 8 hours with just the good bits.)

I'm waiting for a serious K-drama dry spell before I tackle Wu Xiabo's 2-part Advisors Alliance, if ever. It's 86 episodes total. *gulp!*

2
12
reply

Required fields are marked *

I love to try a C-dramas, firstly because they seem to have better quality than K-dramas, and also because I'm quite tired of k-drama tropes (everybody is screaming about them recently)! However, I've had a difficult time with language so far! I still remember 15 years ago when I watched my first k-drama with sub, I never had difficulty with language, but I find Mandarin quite more difficult to understand and I usually lose focus mid-way... Nevertheless I watched ~10 episode of Love Me, If You Dare and I liked it! I'd definitely try 'Finding Mr. Right' next! Thanks for all recommendation!

4
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

As with anything the quality of an individual drama depends on the PD, actors and writer. I would not say that C-Dramas are better or worse than K-Dramas. They are different with different tropes. New can be very good until it eventually becomes old. Language? I just read the english subtitles, am I supposed to know Mandarin? You are scaring me!

2
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

1- You're right: "New can be very good until it eventually becomes old".
2- I mean feeling the actors' emotion from their language (I watched many foreign language movies/series and this is the first time I have a difficulty getting used to a language!)

4
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I actually understand completely, Mandarin has so harsh tones that I am not used too. I personally find it less appealing to listen to than Korean. Please do not consider this a criticism, it is not meant as one.

3

CORRECTION: has so some harsh

0

I actually considered mentioning Divorce Lawyers too. Thanks for contributing that. I also appreciate your support of my recommendations. I have already found Finding Mr. Right 2/Book of Love and play to watch it tonight. I second your recommendation of Divorce Lawyers, including the part about the stupid parts. I suggest a judicious use of the fast forward button. But must emphasize that it is worth the watch.

2
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

Unfortunately, Finding Mr. Right 2/Book of Love just did not strike a chord with me. The story was just a little too abstract.

In addition, a major portion of the movie was filmed in a casino. My beloved grandmother was a hardcore bingo addict. The game was penny-ante and the proceeds went to charity, but the "game" adversely effected my childhood. When grandma had been on a bingo bender the pastries she served for dessert became very low quality. Sometimes they were even day-old. There is nothing more disappointing than a "cheap" day-old cannoli. I would cry myself to sleep. It was very hard on the whole family.

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Dang, @caeparius... I can't breathe. ROFLMAO over your Dear Grandmama's unfortunate bingo habit. The soul-crushing effects of cut-rate day-old baked goods on your vulnerable young psyche is too heartrending to contemplate. I shudder at the soggy horror of "cannoldies."

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

My beloved grandmother was really special, she was a child of the depression who came to America via Ellis Island. Those pastries were always purchased from a "real" bakery and came in a box tied with red and white twine. She had a ball of twine the size of a basketball. She carefully cut just the knot and saved as much of the string as possible. However, she never seem to use the save twine.

Her presents were almost always wrapped with the "fancy" paper from the presents she had previously received. It took her about 5 minutes to unwrap her presents. She took great care to insure the wrapping paper could be used again. I sometimes received birthday presents with Christmas wrapping paper. It actually seemed to make them more special.

3

I also found the CGI scenes distracting and unnecessary. It was like the director really really wanted to added the use of CGI to his resume, so several "special" scenes were shoehorned into the movie. I also thought when the leads imagined their "opposite", it was just a little bit creepy. They seemed to be radioactive [ie glowed green around the edges].

1
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

The radioactive glow is a fair critique; it was completely unnecessary. I like the leads so much, I blurred out the irritating bits (as I do in real life.) Thanks for giving it a try anyway. ;)

0
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I appreciate that you recommended this movie and look forward to viewing any others that you would care to suggest.

I believe that it was a victim of the system. The original was a success so if we increase the budget and make it more "Hollywood", the sequel will be more successful. The original succeeded because it was a simple well told story with excellent actors and excellent cinematography. In addition, the chemistry between the two leads was magical. The sequel had all the correct ingredients, but too many cooks can spoil a meal.

1

One final comment on LAWLESS LAWYER. I wanted to say something about the "kids" and the flashback showing the meeting of the Moms.
Lee Ro-woon as little Sang-pil was wonderful. Once again I am in awe how these Directors can get such emotional performances from a child. I am glad in casting little SP (I assume) they weren't too concerned with physical resemblance. After all who knows what a child will really look like in 10-12 years. The little girl who played the young Jae-yi was very sweet.
I am glad the flashback meeting of the Moms with little SP present was shown. I thought it was well done and pulled the plot together nicely.

4
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm so glad that the show gave us that 15 min heartwarming narrative (both flash-back and -forward ) at the end of the last episode!! Such a great closure! I agree that Lee Ro-woon as little Sang-pil was amazing in emoting, I developed a deep feeling for that kid!
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bk2qsedgAMu/?hl=en
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bk2p3gGAFBp/?hl=en

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks so much for the pics. I love them.
O/T but since you opened the door a bit can I share one of my favorite cast party pics? Here from I REMEMBER YOU (2015) is a picture of Park Bo-gum (adult Min) holding Hong Eun-taek (child Min):
https://78.media.tumblr.com/1e916d4a4852713837fd3977069ab363/tumblr_nsydji0VLZ1to1fhoo3_1280.jpg

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

@marcusnyc20 Bong-soo,

Thanks for mentioning the child actors, and the meeting between little Sang-pil and Jae-yi's mom. These are the kinds of scenes that make such a difference in tying together the past and future threads of the plot.

Lee Ro-woon stole the show as young Hong Gil-dong in REBEL, and he did it again as Sang-pil. Park Bo-gum's Mini-Me from I REMEMBER YOU looks so much like him. Amazing.

Thanks, @persianrose, for the links to the photos of the child & adult actors.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@marcusnyc20 TBDAW is a slight adaption of The Departed (2006 American movie), therefore it's unfortunately not available in any official North American streaming site.

4
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

The Departed?!!! I always thought Lee Joon-gi is the Korean version of DiCaprio (intense and dramatic) and Jung Kyung-ho is a Korean version of Matt Damon (funny with sudden outburst and fast, witty speech )... Now I'm more intrigued to watch TBDAW! Please help: Where I can watch this!????

4
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

4
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

@marcusnyc20 Bong-soo,

Holy cow! So now it's going to be a Zombie Gnome Apocalypse? I don't think a punkin' chuckin' trebuchets are going to cut it. Release the Attack Flamingos! Reinforce the perimeter with Flesh-Ripping Weasels! Unleash the Killer Rabbits! The gloves are officially off...

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for finding this! I read the first line of this synopsis:

After his mother is brutally murdered in front of him ...

... and imagined a montage featuring Lee Joon-gi rejecting a pile of scripts because they're all variations of the same theme. ;)

3
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Haha, drama writers either killed his mother/father brutally (Iljimae, TBDAW, Joseon Gunman, Lawless Lawyer) or made his mother a complete psycho (2 Weeks, Arang, Moon Lover)...

3

Good pick up @tsutsuloo and LOL. Talk about being typecast.

0

CONGRATULATIONS! - we made it back on the MOST COMMENTED list for most probably our last week, FIGHTING!

6
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

I really enjoyed reading all the comments in this thread! Thank you all for sharing your great insight on this show! I just have a little complain about how this show seems to be boycotted by official staffs!! Sorry I don't want to be cynical, but every other current dramas (even Weekend dramas) at least get some mentioning in WWAW thread, Extra, Video, etc!

4
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

Haha @ljgangel probably none of the DB staffs liked it! It might sound a bit of an unusual situation because you're right about most of dramas getting at least something! But I'm pretty sure nobody has a guard against a specific drama to boycott it!

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I also really enjoyed reading all the comments! Thank you @caeparius @pakalanapikake for hijacking and everyone else for excellent comments and speculations!!
Same as you @ljgangel I was wondering why this drama received minimum or no reference by DB? However it received a lot of comments, so they probably made more money out of this hijacked thread than their currently recapped dramas!! ;))

5
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I would not read too much into it, was probably just a coincidence. Too much trouble to do something like that. This beautiful website does not run itself. It takes a tremendous amount of work and time.

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

You're probably right! I'll try to keep a positive mind! :-)

3

Comment was deleted

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *