128

Premiere Watch: Lovely Horribly

 

Lovely Horribly

Time slot: Monday & Tuesday
Broadcaster: KBS
Genre: Horror, rom-com
Episode count: 32 (half-hour episodes, 16 hours total)

Reasons to watch: Horror-romantic-comedy is still a rather uncommon genre mashup, but Master’s Sun was all of those things, so there’s proof it’s possible to turn it into a winning combo. Lovely Horribly tells the love story between a man and a woman who share a fate—more specifically, they share opposite sides of one fate, which means that if one of them is happy, the other is unhappy by default, according to the crappy rules of this universe. I have to admit, that premise is weird enough that I’m dying of curiosity to know how they’ll pull off a happy ending for them both.

It’s also a showbiz drama: Park Shi-hoo is a top star whose life is always going well, Song Ji-hyo is an aspiring drama writer whose life is always going sideways, Lee Ki-kwang is a drama director with the ability to see ghosts and a crush on Song Ji-hyo, and Choi Yeo-jin is the star drama writer with a secret behind her Midas touch. The PD-writer team is new, so we have no idea what to expect from them, but hopefully the supernatural drama set will make for some witty in-jokes and spooky chills. I’m a big wimp when it comes to horror, but the rom-com kind can’t be too bad, right?

 
RELATED POSTS

Tags: ,

128

Required fields are marked *

Who knew "horror rom-com" was the genre I needed?

8
13
reply

Required fields are marked *

Have you seen Spellbound? It's a film that's horror rom-com and it's great.

7
12
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes! It's been on my watch list since Because This is My First Life ;)

3
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

It's like the made the most cliched horror film and the most cliched rom com and mashed them together to create something completely new and interesting. Also Lee Min Ki is awesome, as always.

7
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I should have been bothered by Lee Min ki's character, meek, mild, naive, and a scaredy cat. But it was Lee Min ki...so it was okay.

1

omg I loved that movie! Ack, need to re add to my Watchlist. But wait, Lee Min ki was also accused of sexual assault at one time - but the charges were dropped. So how should we deal with that?

0
7
reply

Required fields are marked *

I remember reading articles with more details that seemed to indicate that this one really was a case of mistaken identity, but since I didn't dig deep enough to find that particular article, feel free to take my comment as hearsay.
https://www.soompi.com/article/876337wpp/lee-min-ki-acquitted-sexual-assault-charges

4
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I admit I was not aware of any charges re Lee Min-ki. I'll have a read.

1

I feel comfortable with the way this was resolved. About Lee Min Kee.
Same with Onew from Shinee.
Sometimes I think I need to tell myself not to Google people.

2

"Lee Min-ki has been found innocent"
Um.. that's not how the law works. There's little detail there.

1

@leetennant: from what I read awhile ago (and I hate to trust any news articles) while he was in the military he went out drinking and acted inappropriately with a female he met at the bar. I don't remember if it happened at the bar or if he went to her place or what, but ....well, I should try to look it up again because it's easy to confuse one case with another, there are so many cases.
Whether it was him or a mistaken identity I don't remember but he did apologize for something lately and said he'd learned a valuable lesson about something or other...is this how rumors get started?

1

I’ve been conflicted about this too. None of these guys who have had allegations have been found guilty so that really is not helpful. The only difference in LMK’s case is that there seems to be less chatter about it (this is my very subjective evaluation) but that again could be because his agency was aggressive about squashing any reports. And on and on we go!! I really don’t know what the right take on this is.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

It seems that he had consensual sex with a different woman at the club in Busan. The woman who accused him, who was also at the club, said she named him by mistake and apologized. https://www.hancinema.net/park-yoo-chun-s-rape-scandal-is-different-from-lee-min-ki-s-96710-amp.html

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Downloading that now. Thanks.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

How to pull off a happy ending?
For those of us who are irked by real life Park Shi-hoo, a happy ending would be Song Ji-hyo falling in love with the second lead Lee Ki-kwang and having a long and joyous life together while leaving Park Shi-hoo pining and regretful for the rest of his life.

62
28
reply

Required fields are marked *

Your comment is gold! ^^; +200 likes if it were possible, but its not so I have to write it to tell you.

12
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I second that.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yesss!

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

You do realize the character is fictional right? You seem to confusing real life with fiction. That’s unfortunate.

0
18
reply

Required fields are marked *

Nope. No confusion. But since I don't derive pleasures IRL by means like internet trolling, drama is my wish fulfillment.

22
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I don't see any confusion here. Some of us choose not to support the work of artists who we feel have crossed a moral line. This actor is purported to have done something reprehensible; therefore, some drama viewers make a choice to not watch the dramas he appears in. This choice is similar to not buying products from companies whose labor or environmental record is objectionable. There is no confusing fact from fiction, but rather making a choice that reflects an individual's morals and values, and hoping that this will effect how a company chooses to do business in the future.

If you still support the actor, that is your choice, and I have neither the wish nor the time to try to change your mindset. However, in the interest of keeping things civil, perhaps you could refrain from belittling the perspective and choices of others.

45
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yeesh, I didn't realize this program was related to the same problematic actor discussed in other DB posts. I'm already rationing my precious time to watch these dramas; I prefer to support on good work and good people.

13
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Song Joong Ki is the only actor I can think of with a spotless reputation.

0

Note—I don't mean "spotless." At the very least, not racist, rapey and abusive. That's really a low bar for being tolerably decent.

14

Media portrayals can merge real life and fiction. Very strong positive impressions of a person can shape their real image as well. That is happening pretty well in Mr. Sunshine too. Many called it the image cleanser of LBH. Well that is still a different case but this is a case of proven guilt yet the perpetrator stays free. Recently a chinese actor was removed from his show because they said that this will invoke a positive image of tha artist even if he was suspected of assault. That actually happens and gives an impression that people can escape from such crimes and also associate the character with the actor. Hence media portrayals are strong enough to rather merge reality and fiction.

5
11
reply

Required fields are marked *

There's no clear case of guilt here either. Park Shi hoo was never convicted of anything. The young woman dropped the case and the police declined to prosecute. I just never liked him as an actor anyway. It makes you wonder why someone as popular as well liked as Song Ji hyo would agree to work with him if he's such a infamous figure.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Seems like i need to educate myself more on this but as a comment below highlights there are many instances making women drop these charges. I also think the case had very serious implications and was seriously pursued and he couldn't act for a while.

1

And herein lies the second of two essential conflicts with watching this show:

1. As @egads says above, one can choose to boycott the product, in the hope that the manufacturer will adopt more ethical means in response.

For those of us watching illegally - as far as I know, none of the leagl sites except Netflix are available in my country - this does not apply. But to a viewer watching legally, it is worth pondering over.

2. The drama can indeed cleanse the image of the actor. I suspect that in SK, Park Shi Hoo has already cleansed his image quite a bit with 'My Golden Life' which was a ratings success (over 30 or 40%).

I find it hard to take a call on this because I only have little information on the incident. What little I do have does lead me to think he crossed a line that should never have been crossed. But nonetheless, I don't want to judge him guilty without adequate knowledge/information - that just becomes a witch hunt.

--
SO with all this, whether to watch or not watch is giving me a headache. I like Lee Gi Kwang & absoluteky adore Song Ji Hyo. And I'm basing my decision to watch the show based on these positive feelings instead of on uncertain, conflicting, negative ones.

As @saturtledaisy says below, I don't know if I can compartmentalise. Yet. I'll know soon enough.

14
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

Even watching illegally, we're supporting him. We'll talk about the show, post gifs, get involved in arguments. It all serves to cleanse his image. It does make it harder that he was never charged or convicted but for me there's a lot of choice in kdramaland these days. I choose... no.

14

But I could easily choose 'yes'. As I said below, I have a lot of dramas on the go already so the choice was made easy by that.

6

Yes @leetennant is right. By watching illegally we are also contributing in an indirect way. A few years earlier someone said that DB's comments were also translated in Korea to know about the reaction of i-fans. Hence, by watching the show even so illegally, then discussing it here or onother websites does lead to buzz which might translate as popularity.

2

@leetennant: If he had gone to prison and served his time I'd give him a 2nd chance.

2

Hmm @leetennant, @wapzy - interesting. I didn't realize that, but it should have been obvious. Dunno why I thought we live in a DB bubble.

But I'll stand by my point 2. Despite statistical probability being in the alleged victim's favour & what little facts i know being in her favour, I'm not in a position to pass Judgement on this. I object to all forms of trial by media.

And before I am called a fake feminist (by any possible readers ^^ ), let me clearly state that I say this as a lawyer who has refused to take on cases pertaining to sexual harassment at the workplace - where we'd be defending the accused. I also say this as a lawyer who works closely with other lawyers in
rights organisations who do defend the accused in rape cases. Pro Bono.

I refuse to make a judgment. What I can do though, is watch it in silence if i am even able to compartmentalise. Thanks for these inputs. Sincerely.

9

@greenfields
I'd never call you a fake feminist. Far from it.

I have a similar problem actually with the band Disturbed. I really love their remake of the classic Sounds of Silence and listen to it all the time. But recently discovered the lead singer waded into #gamergate on the side of the harassers. Now I'm all conflicted. It's only one song, it's only one member of the band, Gamergate is truly horrific and misogynistic and... ergh.

3

@leetennat - yes I know. ^^ That's why I wrote 'any possible readers' because while we've conversed enough on this topic that I'm not worried about you missing my point, others reading this discussion may think I'm defending him. Which is the last thing I want.

Ikr. To listen or not to listen. To watch or not to watch. :( I didn't know about #gamergate btw, thanks for the update. Why is the world like this.

3

Oops. @leetennant

2

@egads is completely right and we do not reward bad behavior. these allegations are serious and this proves that the woman are worthless in their eyes. which is how the world works. people can enjoy the show and watch but many of us can have objections to having to see him and looking at his face on a website we visit and talk about those consequences. media has real-life effects on others, too. we don't live in a vacuum and we never will. why would some of us get upset at sexist or racist or homophobic writing? why would some of us want a man who has rape allegations to be shown on tv and loved? there are so many people who suffer, women, men, or other genders, and some on this very website and they/we have the right to express it. and it is not unfortunate that some of us care.

10
reply

Required fields are marked *

Haha, back in Park Shi-hoo's short-lived golden age, he was known for being the second lead who got the girl.

This would be divine punishment for him! Where's the Cheese in the Trap PD when we need her?

6
reply

Required fields are marked *

for anybody interested in this issue and the very aggressive way that Park Shi-hoo's agency has dealt with any media outlet who discussed his case in the past, I would recommend listening to the Stars in Their Pockets podcast about exactly this issue. PSH is talked about 10 mins in.

It's really disturbing stuff.

https://soundcloud.com/akdramapodcast/dds-men-behaving-badly

9
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thanks for sharing Cloggie!

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Will definitelly listen to it, ty.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Thank you for the link. It was an interesting discussion.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

She falls in love with the second lead. He dies a very painful death of 100 cuts by 100 women...dream ending.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I love Song Ji Hyo, but I am not sure how I feel about watching Park Shi Hoo. Can I compartmentalize? Can I not judge someone who was not convicted and watch him act without feeling icky? I still don't know.

4
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I wonder why Song Ji hyo would do a drama with this guy if he's still so toxic. Otherwise I never liked him much as an actor anyway. I can't see myself bothering with this drama at all.

3
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

so according to every one here, if Park Yoo Chan ever appeared in a drama no one would watch because of his allegations, I feel so sorry for these guys

1
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

For me it's more complicated than that. And while yes a false accusation is horrible and potentially devastating for an actor's career, so too are the effects of an assault that is neither punished nor even believed. If I find the account and source of an allegation credible, even if there is no conviction (because let's be real, law enforcement and the courts don't have a great track record for investigating and trying sexual harassment and assaults), I will likely strike an artist from my watch/listen/support list. For example, Woody Allen has been on my blacklist for decades, and has been joined by the likes of Mel Gibson and Kevin Spacey. My ability to access and read the finer points of allegations in Korea and other Asian countries, limits my understanding of individual situations, but the systemic problems of misogyny, patriarchy, and the devaluation of women's autonomy leads me to lean toward believing women---something history has long not done.

27
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

rly well put

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Me too, blacklist wise. Trump is on my blacklist too.

9
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Oh my blacklist is too long to copy here, and definitely includes that.

7
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Mine too.

1

Well put. So many actors and actress work I do not watch or support because for me your talent does not trump the person you chose to be. Let me add these to your already wonderful list:

Johnny Depp
Roman Poloski
Nate Parker
Chadwick B
The Afflecks (mainly Casey sneak in your bed while you are sleeping sexual harasser Affleck)
Matt Damon (cause he defends that)
Mark Wahlberg
Too many others. Honesty most men were a mistake.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

no, i wouldn't. also it's 2018 and the "me too" era (though a lot of us have been advocating long before that) and the nonsense that people should be paid and rewarded for horrible behavior even if they are only """ALLEGATIONS"" when rape is hard to prove bc the system is built on misogyny and people do not believe victims (and 1 in 100 woman lie about rape.) these men do not deserve time, money, nor attention

10
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

nor anyone feeling sorry for them, imho

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

These cases are almost always "he said, she said" and extremely hard to prove. It's very suspicious when the "victim" drops the charges. We can think of all kinds of reasons: did the police convince them that they'll lose because of the popularity of the actor? Or did they really try to commit fraud? One thing is sure, never believe what the press says.
We could say that probably 90% of these accusations are real. But which ones are truly not guilty? If it went to a jury trial would you convict without proper evidence?
As far as the drama itself, there's too much on my plate anyway so thankfully I don't need to make a moral decision about whether or not to give it a go.

4
24
reply

Required fields are marked *

In 95% of cases the female victim drops the charges because she is told by the police the case will be long, there's little likelihood of success, and the minute she makes the accusation her daily life becomes a living hell.

Statistically speaking, women do not lie about rape.

I also have too much on my plate, which is almost a shame because it looks like the kind of mindless mid-week (for me) show I was looking for. But since I'm already watching so many dramas, it makes the difficult decision of whether to watch or not easy.

9
10
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes, statistically speaking, but that surely isn't 100% statistically. However, your first paragraph is exactly right. If the man is accused you're supposed to think "innocent until proven guilty" and it's next to impossible to prove unless it's been videotaped.
It's such an emotionally charged issue and as a female I can just imagine what a maddening, horrifying experience it would be to go thru.
But I've also been on juries and it's very difficult to think a person is innocent to begin with. Most of what I've found is the opposite: they've been charged, they must be guilty unless they can prove their innocence. And there are a few - a very few - women who have wrongly accused.
This issue is so complicated my head is spinning with what ifs...

4
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I watched a episode of Theme of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit I think or one of the group, and they showed a trial of a rape case. And at the end, they just finished the episode after the pleading of the lawyer/prosecutor. And I had no idea who to believe. The both had good arguments. It was a very interesting episode.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I remember this episode so clearly. I couldn’t make up my mind even in the fake setting. It’s been years and I still remember this episode. One of the best ones IMO

0

I was trying to apply some logic here but I don't seem to be getting the message across very well. Everybody seems to think I'm on the male's side or something and I'm not. Very frustrated right now. I give up...

4
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

I would never think that. Really, never. Ever.

My issue, and I think the issue of a lot of people, is that we know that sex crimes live in their own horrible misogynistic world. Sex is always a red herring - as soon as it's involved, people get distracted. We know that everything you could say about the legal system goes out the window as soon as it's a sex crime against a woman. Victim blaming is rampant. And in the case of Korean actors and idols, all they have to do is send an Oppa whistle to their crazed fans and the woman's life is over. Women drop accusations simply because it's too exhausting and the people who should be on their side - the police for example - actively re-victimise them.
Many women say going to trial with a rape accusation is like being raped twice. Now imagine that along with being bombarded with rape and death threats from "Oppa's" fans while they physically and virtually harass you.

It'd take a better woman than me to forge ahead with the case.

9
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Let's just say I didn't report something once because it would have only pissed him off.

2

@linda-palapala
If you're speaking from personal experience then a) I'd 100% believe you and have heard this from other woman as well and b) I'm really sorry to hear that.

5

You know what - I temporarily forgot about Hollywood. Women complained for decades but no one believed them, until there was overwhelming proof. Now the tide is somewhat turning.
Several years ago a relative was on a jury rape case. I was complaining at the time that men always get away with it and the relative said that isn't true. The case he was on the female finally admitted she was mad he'd broken up with her and wanted to get back at him. At the time I believed my relative, but now, after knowing how women have to withdraw the complaint because it's like getting raped a second time, I believe that's what happened to her. But our belief and what can be proved in court are two different things.

8

I'm sorry you're frustrated. I do not think you are championing the side of abusers, but rather trying to interject the very reasonable question of why, if there is evidence, have charges not been filed and convictions made? That my friend is the zillion dollar question, as it not only exposes problems within systems, but also should make us look critically at media coverage.

6
reply

Required fields are marked *

I understand your frustration and to me you did not come across as anti-male. Sexual assault/rape related topics automatically bring a high degree of sensitivity. IMO you we trying to work through a difficult conundrum and it gets messy.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

there is a cctv footage of him dragging her into his apartment and he admitted to having "sex" with her. this isn't "he said she said", it's "he had money and power, she's a woman".

10
12
reply

Required fields are marked *

I will believe you that there is cctv footage, which is pretty damning. I don't know how S Korean laws work so I don't understand why charges were dropped. Wouldn't the police file charges themselves if they had that evidence?
I have read in some news articles that some of the older male actors who have been charged actually don't get away with it anymore. So is it because they're older and no longer needed or wanted by the industry?

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I was about to point out this thing about the cctv. Plus the messages...plus everything. There's just no way around this.

6
9
reply

Required fields are marked *

Then why wasn't he charged?

0
8
reply

Required fields are marked *

money and power go a long, long way

3

Money? People in power? The ever present idea that a woman should not put herself in a situation that could lead to this (i.e. she's drunk, etc.). Probably a combination of all of these, with the added, usual bonus of the "he said" carrying more weight than the "she said."

4

@natzillagorilla @egads
Then why was the S Korean President convicted of bribery? And the CEO of Samsung? (I hope I got the charges and names correct). They certainly have more power than a 3rd rate actor.

1

I think it is because it is still he said/she said. The cameras showed she was too drunk to walk on her own into his house.
From that many of us believe she would be too drunk to give consent if she was conscious inside the home.

3

...misogyny and capitalism buddy

3

didn't mean to upvote but @linda-palapala r u him in disguise or something. also the ex president had literlaly half the population (who all have diff ideals) march in the street to get her gone and impeached. and the world works in "mysterious" ways but all of this is intentional.

1

I've read that he was charged, but when she withdrew her complaint, the charges were also withdrawn. You could search for articles in English on The Korea Times and The Korea Herald.

0

There isn't a question of if they had sex. The question was of consent. His claim was that she woke up after having passed out and gave consent; however she was black out drunk and did not remember that the next day. (Obviously, he should have known better. Seems he is pretty but dumb.) Then when she was discussing the situation with her pal over texts a couple days later the other woman suggested that she sue him *for his money* not simply that she should press charges for rape due to her being drunk. (Those texts were released, I read their direct translation.) Meanwhile he stated he really liked her and had given her his personal phone number because he wanted to keep seeing her. So it all became a mess in great part because of the money motivation and everyone backed down. The woman went on to be happily married in the meantime and he went offscreen for a couple years and reflected on why drunken hookups are wrong.

Anyway the thing is, lately so many sexual assault charges have come to life and usually when one gets made a bunch of others come out. Like when Mickey Yoon had that incident with a prostitute and a couple other women spoke up - or when Antony Rapp accused Kevin Spacey of trying to have sex with him while he was underage and then several other people spoke up about similar harassment. Nobody else has had a complaint about PSH. So I'm thinking that this was a 1-off where he got too excited and was stupid. The woman chose to not press charges and moved on. I don't think there's any point wasting energy being angry about this when there are so many *habitual* predators who are still out there doing wrong. Of course if PSH every has another charge after this it would be a different story. So far he's keeping his nose clean.

0

That CCTV footage - a series of images of him dragging the drunken woman from his car into his apartment - is the kind of ’evidence’ that I will never buy PSH’s line of concensual sex. Compared to other cases, this is the one case that I won’t be on PSH side despite charge dropping, unproved guilt etc etc.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

WILL WE NOW HAVE TO SEE PICTURES OF PSH ON DRAMABEANS FOR THE NEXT 8 WEEKS (OR HOWEVER LONG IT TAKES TO SHOW 32 HALF-HOUR EPISODES)? :(

THERE ARE ALREADY 2 PICTURES OF HIM ON THE MAIN PAGE. THAT'S 2 TOO MANY.

7
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

AND A TOP BANNER PICTURE, TOO. THAT MAKES 3!

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

lmao i was gonna watch this then i saw park si hoo yikes

2
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

honestly the premise sounds wonderful too bad this man still has a job

4
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm so upset about them ruining Leeki and Song Ji-hyo together in a drama. I'm upset at them too for joining on the first place!

6
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

honestly me too. i know not everyone is like us/me but money cannot be above monsters like this. i hate the fact that he can get a job and that this is another example of not giving a fuck about women.

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I read in some news that Korea is one of the worst countries to live in if you are a woman (don’t get me wrong, I live in Brazil, so I live in a country where i'ts one of the worst too) the patriarchal level in the country is still a lot. And it is extremely difficult to say when an accusation is true or false. See the examples of many kdrama who are handling this, Miss Hamuri, Pretty Noona and the latest Your Honor.
In many cases, the woman is encouraged from withdrawing complaints, either by police or by lawyers themselves, otherwise, they make a survey of how many sexual partners she had, how many cases os one night stand she had, was she drunk? How she was dressed? She went into the bedroom because she wanted to? Why she not shouted louder? Or why she did not shouted at all? And we know as that society always judges the victim, and sometimes the humiliation is so much that many do not even charge or when they do, many also withdraw.
And to prove whether is or not sexual harassment is very difficult, and the funniest thing is the all scandals I've seen of Korean celebrities, they've never been guilty. Not one, ever. My moral doesn’t allow me to watch this drama, it may be that he is innocent, of course he can, but also it may be that he’s not, and in a society such as Korean, just like in my country, I know how easy it is to escape, and how easy to forgive men and make them always as victims, then in case of doubt, I avoid watching, as someone said in the comments above, if a company is accused of killing children, you will stop consuming their products, or if a doctor is charged with sexual harassment, you will stop consulting him. So why should not I stop consuming the work of an actor?

7
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Sorry: Miss Hammurabi

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

But in a jury trial this is always the case, not matter what the charges are. The victims and witnesses are all made to be dishonorable. The trial then becomes about them. And you said "society" always judges the victim. Unfortunately this is usually the case.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

This drama sounds like something up my alley and I really like the posters, but I find it difficult to pick up because of Park Shi Hoo, especially since his character is that of a top star whose life is going well. Maybe I'll be able to do it later on...

So...time for another The Master's Sun rewatch.

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Nah his life starts going downward in the 1st episode Not many top star moments

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I don't know if this even appropriate to post here, but alongside these conversations about moral right/supporting and not supporting actors' work because of their wrogng doings, we also should one day have a conversation about whether people are allowed to move past their wrongs, and if they can be anything other than what they did wrong. Because that framing of once wrong always wrong is also problematic AF. Not all wrongs are the same, and after atonement and apology, wrongdoers should be allowed to become better. But low I said, that is another conversation for another day. Because not all wrongdoing is equal. Adultery (eg Lee Byung-heon) and rape (Park Shi-hoo), or even emotional and financial abuse, are all very different wrongdoings and require different redresses.

But we need to talk about it at some point.

Kthxbai

10
13
reply

Required fields are marked *

I agree. As also trial by media - something I seriously object to, from having seen it up close & personal.

Nevertheless, everyone has their right to their opinion. The only wrong opinions imo are 'oppa didn't do it' or 'she was lying, he's innocent'. In short, we don't know. It's a case of Schrödinger's cat (rapist?) here.

5
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I agree that trial by media is problematic, but that is usually the only way we hear anything about these cases as the system is so stacked against victims, they don't often make it to court. And since they rarely make it to court, fans not supporting these projects may be the only consequence of these behaviors.

5
reply

Required fields are marked *

since you brought it up....what do you mean? because you're right the once always wrong always wrong can be confusing but at the same time NO ONE is owed forgiveness if they cannot give it.

no one says that LBH = PSH, but they sure exist in the same system. and LBH has done more than just adultery. no one or not very many people will lump them in the same box minus the fact that misogyny ruins things.

re: LBH, if he is a serial offender of just being an aint shit man (the stuff with that girl from canada and that bball player) then the cheating (and also he can't act so....) what's your point? and why on earth should people give a shit. terrible men are a dime a dozen esp in this industry.

re: PSH he is an actual abuser (rapist) who has had 0 consequences. i am not saying that LBH can never, to a viewer or a fan, move on from his pass nor am i saying they are comparable what i am saying is people can choose who to like and for very solid reasons. if we don't say they're on the same page but point out how consistently men get jobs and are allowed to keep going, that's fine.

i'm honestly kind of perplexed and think this is a bit of a strawman argument and derailing.

2
9
reply

Required fields are marked *

i think there's a lot to unpack here i.e. the reaction to letting abusers and other terrible people get away with work while showing no remorse. but in my house i do not accept the kyriarchy, racism, capitalism, misogyny, trans or homophobia so i have a staunch NO policy. it's just wild to see some of the comments here lol like "why are you mad" well buddy

(btw, i want to be a filmmaker soooo badly and trust me even tho im coming from a western perspective this stuff infiltrates the industry and student's minds even about what is/isnt acceptable.)

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

also what we DO need to talk about more is how i don't watch k-dramas (or any drama, but this is the time/place) to feel belittled, annoyed at the misogyny and homophobia, and the racism. that's the things that we "need to talk about" and have change---even if they never had a western audience THAT is egregious. and these things will continue to be perpetuated. woody allen is he-said--she-said too and it took DECADES for roman polanski but now people are apologizing for even supporting him (too little too late but yk)

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Comment was deleted

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Lemme see if I can address these points. It's not derailment at all. At what point did I invalidate any body's argument? Or take the discussion off on a tangent? Saying that we also need to expand a conversation from just mentioning what people have tone wrong to also acknowledging people becoming better than their mistakes/ atoning for their mistakes and crimes even as we discuss thoswith crimes is most certainly not derailment.

As for the epistle on Park Shi-hoo and Lee Byung-heon, I mentioned them because those men are currently starring in dramas that are being talked about on dramabeans, not because I have anything to say about their particular messes.

Nor did I once equate their sins. Shitty people come in all grades and sizes, in and out of the public eye. And unless any crimes have been committed, I personally don't care about actors' lives apart from their craft.

If a crime has been committed, I'm interested in atonement, apology, consequences and restitution. But that is me

People are allowed to like what they like, that's true. And I don't know why you implied I said anything different.

4
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

And although I say I don't care about actors' personal lives beyond their job, if I ever find out that Hu Ge is anything less than a stand-up guy, I'll be crushed.

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

That's how I feel about Liu Hao Ran, but then he's only 20...

1

if no one takes responsibility, when does atonement, apology, consequences and restitution come in? there has been plenty of work about restorative justice and we still haven't figured it out and that is on an individual and personal level. but bringing that up when they have faced no consequences doesn't actually apply. in all of these cases there is little to no consequence or apology and serial abusers, imo, do not deserve it.

1
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

and i would also like to point out the reception of the world/society/their fans makes a difference.

when xxxtenacion died though he was "making amends" his fans were adamant he did nothing wrong (and he kept bragging about it) same with these men. i think in a discussion of if he should be allowed on tv (he shouldnt) when he faced NO consequences (not to mention rape is incredibly difficult to even get justice on; where is the jail time? even with my belief in major prison reform a quick solution is immediate justice for victims)

so, no, i do not find this argument valid

2

Once again it seems like you want to focus on particular instances when I was making a general point re: my very first opening sentence. So I'll just leave this discussion. It isn't fruitful.

We seem to be kn the same page, just in different contexts. So issokay

1

@ladyjaye i didn't mean particular instances but i was giving them based on a broader context. however, fair enough if you say i was misunderstanding you then i will trust your interpretation if we are on the same page

0

I agree that there's a discussion due about moving on after atonement and apology. I think the discussion would be better to have without names.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Lee Gi Kwang is another reason not to watch. He's one of the idols that did blackface a few years ago (wish I knew this before watching Circle).

0
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

NOOOOOOOO!!!!! This just ruined my night. *in my Lauryn Hill voice* I used to love, now I don't.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I don't think he should be blamed for this. IIRC he did this on a variety show. I suspect he had very little choice in the matter. Kpop idols have very little control over their schedules, and variety shows are pretty harrowing in that they routinely force idols to do humiliating things. The PDs of that show should be excoriated, not Gi-kwang.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

its quite good. ep 1-2 are very nice

1
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yeah ....Hard Pass on this one.
I will not lie, I would have watched the hell out of this drama ...but since Park Shi-hoo is the lead, any desire to even take a peek vanished instantly. Sorry not Sorry.

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

It would be awesome if this show was somewhat similar to the movie "Eerie Romance" with Lee Min Ki. Totally loved the vibe of that movie.

1
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Why did Song Ji Hyo and the other actors join the cast? I only have one answer, "We will never know." Who knows what happens behind the scenes besides the people themselves. Another answer would be "because they're actors". You can despise someone in real life and still act with them because that is the job description. No matter how a guy is in real life one's decision is dependent on them. So they may have joined the project because of the script, the writer, co-actors, director, salary, or coz of the network but whatever that reason is, It's their decision, their lives. I am not promoting anyone, probably besides SJH and I will continue promoting her because ever since I saw her kicked a grown ass man in Running Man, I know she can take care of herself.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Alright, I just going to link the news about PSH's case and I'm going to summarize but also include my opinion while following this case at that time. (there are other news outlets/websites that also reported this case, so if there's a refute or missing info, feel free to add. It's good to hear all sides.)

18/02/2013 - News reported PSH accused of rape. PSH and his acquaintance, Kim met the woman, A, at a bar in Gangnam district on midnight 14/02/2013 and the rape happened at PSH's home on night 14/02/2013 / morning 15/02/2013 depending on which news reports and sources.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/02/19/2013021900962.html?related_all
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130218001051&ACE_SEARCH=1

20/02/2013 - Based on the bar's CCTV, the bar owner said (he's not present when the three drank on 14/02/2013) the woman did not appear drunk while walking out.
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130220000745&ACE_SEARCH=1
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130220000745&ACE_SEARCH=1

21/02/2013 - Police were investigating CCTV footage in the parking lot of PSH's apartment. PSH's acquaintance, Kim was seen in CCTV carrying the drunk unconcious A to PSH's home. A said to the police she's surprised that she got drunk so fast in the span of 10-minutes ride to PSH's place.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/02/21/2013022101281.html?related_all

25/02/2013 - PSH repeatedly failed to attend the scheduled questioning by police (19/02/2013, 24/02/2013). Police also stated on Friday (22/02/2017) due to suspicion of the drink being spiked, they obtained blood and urine sample from the victim. (My take: A quick google shows that drug especially date rape drug will flushed out of
the system within 12-72 hours after ingestion, the rape was night 14/02/2013 / morning 15/02/2013, that's pretty much gone already.)
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/02/25/2013022500675.html?related_all
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130222000734&ACE_SEARCH=1

26/02/2013 - Police said they will seek an arrest warrant if PSH failed to appear by March 1. PSH's attorney complained and wanted to change the precinct that handled the case (which is near to victim's house) due to dissatisfaction on how the case being handled. The precinct declined.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/02/25/2013022500675.html?related_all
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130225000711&ACE_SEARCH=1

28/02/2013 - Police obtained messages exchanged between A and Kim. At this point, the public started to doubt A because why would she contacted Kim but she said it's because she wanted to protest of what had happened.(me at that time: If you're following this at that time, it's mind-boggling at how fast the knetz and public switched side, they started to label the victim as sly/ slut/ gold-digger and was faking the whole thing). The forensic team stated they unable to trace...

2
4
reply

Required fields are marked *

...however PSH' DNA was in the sample test. test.http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/02/28/2013022800964.html?related_all

All right folks, this thing started to get messy and people started to doubt the victim, due to A's friend, B.

04/03/2013 - PSH appeared on 01/04/2013 for questioning. Police also obtained Kakao messages exchanged between A and her friend, B. PSH's lawyer used this exchange to prove PSH's innocence by claiming A staged the whole thing but PSH have yet to provide concrete proof that the sex was consensual.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/03/04/2013030400729.html?related_all

06/03/2013-07/03/2013 - The messages exchanged between A and B was being published , what happened was A sought help from B. B goaded A to extort money from PSH. B
also asked A to pretend to look sad and ill and A said she will do that (knezt were so focused for this part only that they dismissed the CCTV and the rape claim). B also coincidentally were about to meet a CEO who is friend with PSH's former agency CEO Hwang. B told him what had happened and the CEO Hwang said to get back at PSH.ALL OF THIS WERE BEING TOLD BY B TO A WEEKLY MAGAZINE, none of it was coming from A. Later, CEO Hwang denied B's claim.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/03/06/2013030601025.html?related_all
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/03/07/2013030701093.html?related_all

So, at this point, people started to believe this whole thing was a conspiracy by A, B and CEO Hwang and it's CEO Hwang plan to get back at PSH for leaving his agency.

And so many statements/ rumors from outsiders appeared out of nowhere (and I'm so tired of media keep piling useless irrelevant statements at that time), claiming A used to do this 2 years before to other person.

But despite all the ruckus and knetz started to blame the women:

02/04/2013 - Police pressed rape charge against PSH (quasi-rape)
“Putting together the evidence including the two parties’ statements, CCTV images, mobile text messages and the drug test results of the alleged victim, Park will be charged for quasi-rape, and his friend, identified by his surname Kim who was with Park on the day, for indecent sexual assault,” Seoul Seobu Police Station said in an official statement.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/04/03/2013040300951.html?related_all
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130402000734&ACE_SEARCH=1

And then,

10/05/2013 - The victim dropped the rape charges against PSH, and since sexual offenses in Korea are prosecuted only when the victim files charges, prosecutors automatically followed suit.

My whole suspicion with PSH and Kim is, if PSH wanted to slept with A and it was consensual, why did Kim escorted both of them to PSH's place? About the drinks, there were multiples sources, some said 1 bottle for three of them, some said 1 bottle for each of them, some...

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

That’s enlightening. But You know none of this is going to effect the dramas ratings right? If the show succeeds he will almost certainly get regular offers. People will believe what they want and all the backlash won’t change that.

Anyway. Regarding the Drama:The consensus is First episode of very intriguing and entertaining and is getting good press.

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

...said 2 bottles and only PSH didn't drink, I don't even know which 1 is right. But the thing is only the victim got drunk. Also, Kim clearly got caught on CCTV carrying unconscious A to PSH's place and PSH just let him did that. Why the people completey dismissed this evidence? And 1 more, despite all PSH's side said that they will prove that PSH was innocent, NONE OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED PROVED THE VICTIM WAS CONSCIOUS AND THE SEX WAS CONSENSUAL.

Also, from the interview with Kim, he said that A got so drunk that she vomited in the elevator at PSH's place.

And you know what's the worst?
Kim's statement,"If force was used, there would be injury on A’s body. But there was no injury on A’s body at all, so there was absolutely no rape."

PSH did not get convicted ONLY BECAUSE THE VICTIM DROPPED THE CHARGE. None of it suggest that he is 100% not guilty/ innocent.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

28/02/2013 - The words got cut. Sorry.
The forensic team stated they unable to trace any drug however PSH' DNA was in the sample test.

And sorry for linking the same links, I swear I've checked multiple times before posting but I'm too careless, plus so many words, my eyes get so blurry, gosh.

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

His smiling face and healthy career.
After all of that. The rage. I hope the victim is okay.... Hopefully she left the country tbh.... and live as well as possible elsewhere.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Update:
1. I checked out ep 1 earlier in the day. And nope, compartmentalisation fail I think. Though I would like to not pass judgement on the actor, I can't help but question his character in the drama - as a direct result of the actor.

2. Thanks @cloggie for sharing the insightful podcast. There were definitely new ideas there that I haven't come across earlier. :) {People are so amazing!} My views on what I consider a 'trial by media' are unchanged, but there's a lot of food for thought in there. It'll probably take me a week to settle my thoughts.

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

@saya's podcast is a real gem, and hearing the diversity of perspectives on this issue, and dramas in general, has been educational.

I appreciate that the discussion here has been a civil one with the focus on thinking about the issue critically without resorting to name calling and/or shaming others for their views. Bravo Beanies, and thanks @javabeans and @girlfriday for creating such a space.

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

On the narrow topic of this drama, I gotta say I'm not impressed by this dude so far. This is my first time watching a drama in which he has a role, but I like Gi-kwang and Song Ji-hyo waaaaaay waaaay more than I like him.

On the broader topic, I confess to being of two minds. I'm a law student. I've worked pro bono cases involving sexual assault, both on behalf of the accused and on behalf of of the complainant (not as the prosecuting lawyer; I've worked family law cases in which there are concurrent criminal law issues). My experience has been that my outlook on this topic has changed radically. Having seen the effect false accusations have on accuseds and failures to prosecute have on complainants, I confess to now being pretty casuistic about sexual assault. It may be that complainants are statistically unlikely to make false accusations**, but making a determination based on this alone would be sensible only when there is a general dearth of information. In practice, a lot of information is typically available, even to the public, in these cases such that it's not as simple as computing P(X has committed sexual assault|X has been accused of committing sexual assault) because P(X is guilty) will be conditioned on a lot of other facts in addition to to the fact that X has been accused. This is just a long way of saying that extrapolating from a general pattern to specific instances is tricky.

**I've had to write about the statistical evidence in this area before, and boy is it confusing. But one thing that is definitely true is the fact that extrapolating American statistics to the South Korean context probably paints a misleading picture (I suspect in SK the likelihood that a person is lying about being sexually assaulted are loweer than in the US).

2
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I'm watching it for Ji Hyo ssi and Gikwang ssi...and the story.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

I hate to see all the negative comments spoiling this drama regarding the male cast. Let the law handle it, there are too many accusations based on what they read on the media. Ya'll only judging based on what you read from the media, just STOP it, seriously you need to stop believing everything you read on the net.

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Can u show proofs that PSH is accused?

Because of fans like this, celebrities will feel that its fine to do things like that since fans will still support them.

I wish all his dramas will flop, until he admit his mistake, apologize, and get his punishment. So that people take this thing seriously.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

I hate negative comments about PSH, it happened long time ago. Please look to the present and future. Lovely Horribly good film with him and all the casts.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Now that a ton of people said they won't watch this, I surely will.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

This is a very fun drama. I will continue watching it inspite of any rumours.

As an outsider, I don’t know the truth. If PSH really committed crime, I hope he’ll pay for it. But there’s also a chance that he didn’t (the case was dropped. He never went through a trial. Noone was proved innocent nor guilty).

So I am just gonna continue enjoying Lovely Horrible because it’s fun and all the acting is good. Can’t wait for the next episode!

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *