40

Nothing Uncovered: Episode 1 (First Impressions)

This premiere does not pull its punches in the slightest, dishing up a tense mystery that traps its heroine in a vortex she can barely see past. With illicit deals, incorrigible villains, and a plethora of secrets to uncover, will she succeed in grabbing the truth by its collar?

Editor’s note: This is an Episode 1 review only. For a place to chat about the entire drama, visit the Drama Hangout.
 
EPISODE 1

Nothing Uncovered: Episode 1 (First Impressions)

The star of our show, and of her news program, is the investigative journalist SEO JUNG-WON (Kim Haneul). Exposing the collusion between a politician and a journalist, at the expense of her colleague, Jung-won is unwaveringly tenacious and highly committed to her values.

After work, Jung-won is greeted by her doting husband SEOL WOO-JAE (Jang Seung-jo and his soulful smitten eyes), who sweetly offers her a piggyback ride and grins giddily when she takes his arm instead. He celebrates her program’s third anniversary with a limited-edition necklace, and staunchly defends her from the spiteful criticism of his chaebol dad (hello there Jung Woong-in with a mustache).

Nothing Uncovered: Episode 1 (First Impressions)

The nature of Jung-won’s job, and the ruthlessness with which she exposes unethical behavior, inevitably earns her more than a few enemies. One of them is ASSEMBLYMAN MO (Yoon Je-moon) — the politician she’d exposed at the start of the episode — and he’s a nasty piece of work with a side of arrogant elitism.

Following the rumors of Assemblyman Mo sponsoring the actress CHA EUN-SAE (Han Ji-eun), Jung-won continues her investigation of this corrupt congressman. She’s been relying on her trusty informant to dig up intel for her, despite how thoroughly they conceal their identity with a voice changer, and she pursues the lead they give her about the politician’s aide.

That is, until it leads her to a dead end. The only trace left is a trail of blood on the asphalt, and at the other end of it is a dead body hanging over a windowsill. In a panic, Jung-won rushes up to the unlocked apartment, but the woman is long dead.

As the first to discover the corpse, Jung-won inadvertently becomes the prime suspect. The victim had been Assemblyman Mo’s housekeeper, and her house had been ransacked, lending credence to the theory that Jung-won either murdered her or contaminated a crime scene for a scoop.

The detective on the case is KIM TAE-HEON (Yeon Woo-jin), a competent ace capable of rescuing a hostage and disarming a suspect with just his bare fists. His restrained concern for Jung-won hints at a shared history between them, but the turmoil of the case and the positions they’ve found themselves in doesn’t afford much room for a proper reunion.

Nothing Uncovered: Episode 1 (First Impressions)

Plagued by traumatic flashbacks of her father’s dead body — he’d also been stabbed in his own home — Jung-won can barely pull herself together. Her distress is further exacerbated by an ominous message from an unknown number that goads her into suspecting her husband, though it doesn’t specify the reason.

Then a month later, Eun-sae brazenly blindsides Jung-won with the claim that she’s together with Woo-jae, and three months pregnant. Oh, and she sent that text. A journalist through and through, Jung-won doesn’t buy the flimsy evidence of Woo-jae’s books on the shelves and the ultrasound photo that could belong to anyone. She keeps her head held high in the face of Eun-sae’s scornful provocations, but in private, she buckles from the revelation and her burgeoning suspicion.

Ever since the housekeeper incident, Jung-won has been seeing a psychiatrist for her insomnia and PTSD. After one of her sessions, the receptionist informs her that they’ll be texting her the address of the building they’re moving to — and this immediately sets off my warning bells, because surely any reputable establishment would have their new location ready before transferring patients over.

Sure enough, when Jung-won arrives at the designated location for her next appointment, it’s an apartment shrouded in shadows. I suppose her career must have made her accustomed to shady locations, because I most certainly would not enter such a place, but Jung-won bravely walks in.

The first thing she’s greeted by is a portrait of Eun-sae, before her gaze falls to a very familiar sight on the floor — a dead body lying prone amidst her own blood. Eun-sae has been stabbed too, bringing this episode’s death toll up to a total of three.

Nothing Uncovered: Episode 1 (First Impressions)

Ooh, color me intrigued. The characters may fill familiar archetypes, but the mystery is unfolding at a satisfying pace while still keeping some secrets close to the vest, and we have a solid heroine at the center of it all. Jung-won is an admirable protagonist that’s easy to root for, both in the way she unflinchingly holds her ground against misogyny in the workplace, and the way she sheds her defenses and melts into an affectionate wife around Woo-jae.

As for Woo-jae’s supposed infidelity, I dearly hope there’s some other reason for his visit to an OB-GYN. Jung-won saw him enter alone, and Eun-sae wasn’t able to cough up any damning proof of their supposed affair — say, photos or videos of them together. I know dramaland trends come and go, but I would very much like the cheating husband trope to enter the “go away and never come back” phase.

It’s for this reason that I dearly hope Eun-sae’s claims are fabricated, because her flimsy evidence and convenient timing don’t seem to hold much water. Her alleged connection to Assemblyman Mo puts her in a prime position to be a pawn in a revenge smear campaign against Jung-won, especially with how abruptly she inserted herself into Jung-won’s life right after the exposé was aired.

From a narrative standpoint, it’d also be much more interesting for Woo-jae to be falsely accused, and for Jung-won to navigate between her instinctive feelings of betrayal and her commitment to trusting her spouse. It’s a little too early to tell, but I do think this story has potential if it plays its cards right. Is the mysterious informant friend or foe? Is Woo-jae loyal, or has he already crossed the line? May our heroine uncover the truth, and leave no stone unturned.

Nothing Uncovered: Episode 1 (First Impressions)

 
RELATED POSTS

Tags: , , , , , ,

40

Required fields are marked *

@solstices. Thanks for the recap of this episode. I agree with you wholeheartedly--if this show sticks with familiar types, the heroine, the pace, and the conventional mystery will be enough to keep me watching, but it won't be particularly memorable, whereas if it adds some twists --husband maybe innocent, informant maybe guilty, psychiatrist maybe implicated, etc. it could be really worthwhile.

6
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

OK, I get it, I think.

At least after episode one, this is going to be that fantasy where there's a hard-nosed FL who knows her stuff, stuck in (in)decision between two (flawed) hot men who both want the best for her in all the ways, as she tries her hardest to live her best life as an independent woman who doesn't need the love or attention of these two hot men (too much). Also murders.

I could get behind it, except I'm not feeling much of a connection to this specific FL. I'm willing to see if she grows on me, though. Or maybe I need to quit my job and become an investigative journalist to better understand her travails. The things we do for k-drama...

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I want to watch a show with Jang Seung-Jo but not another where he has supposedly cheated on his wife which was part of his storyline in Strangers Again. He has the most beautiful eyes but I think I will wait to see how this unfolds.

8
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Plus one on his eyes. Just as memorable as Lee So-hyuk's voice.

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

I am dropping this one because I just like his eyes too much and I don't want him to get hurt or end up evil. With Yeon Woo Jin as a first male lead, I don't see how JSJ's character would end up in a better position.

4
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Did you notice how they're aging, tho?? Swoon for the smile lines/wrinkles actually showing us that you're getting older, man. GOOD CHOICE.

5
reply

Required fields are marked *

sounds good, but not available for me....

2
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Nor to me. Sigh. I want to see Yeon Woojin in something as memorable as Queen for 7 days. Nothing else of his has resonated emotionally with me as much Queen for 7 Days. He was wonderful in it as was Park Minyoung.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I don’t know why I feel the therapist is suspicious. And didn’t get husband make the appointment for her?
It’s starting to look like she is being framed.
And woman, stop touching dead bodies and leaving your fingerprints everywhere. You see blood call cops!

6
6
reply

Required fields are marked *

He's such a good husband, he's also her "Life Secretary," you see...totally innocent.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

If my husband got me a necklace my first qn would be ‘what did you do now?’ 😂

4
reply

Required fields are marked *

YES! she is an investigation journalist, not some rando high schooler. Why would she touch the body? It has also happened not once but twice during one episode.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

I keep thinking about the masked informant, Zeus. If, when he is unmasked, we see an unfamiliar face, it doesn't pack too much of a punch. So he (she?) is probably someone we already met, or someone we will meet later in the series. For the time being I suspect the psychiatrist, just because I don't have other suspects.

2
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Also, how do you get a trusted informant? She must have known him from before? Having watched ep 2, I have my guess, but it may be a spoiler here since that character wasnt introduced in ep 1 yet.

0
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Oops, I saw ep. 2, but I can't think about anyone...

0
reply

Required fields are marked *

MEH, I tried it. I will watch the second episode but only for JSJ, my love for him will keep me another few episodes, but whatever injectables Kim Haneul did to her face it very obvious, unless she smiles, only her mouth moves and it is incredibly distracting.

5
3
reply

Required fields are marked *

The first 15 min she was so stiff. I didn’t remember her being so bad having watched ‘on my way to the airport’. But she got a bit better later.
But yeah, could be what you are saying. But even her eyes/expressions felt off.

3
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

That's her?!! I know I knew the name, but I didn't recognize this person (in this k-drama, I thought she is an actress that I haven't seen before).

2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I watched the first two episodes but in the looks department I couldn’t get over how almost pasty looking Jang Seung-jo appears. Give this guy some color please.
This is my first Kim Ha-neul drama so I have no comparison.

3
reply

Required fields are marked *

Is there another translation for the name of her investigative show? "Nothing uncovered" means "everything still covered" in English. I'm not understanding why this would be the name of her tv show that's supposed to uncover the truth behind the news.

2
12
reply

Required fields are marked *

I kept thinking about this during the show--both in terms of the drama's main title and the name of the investigative news show!!!! I actually shouted at one point, "You mean, 'Nothing LEFT Uncovered,' people!!!!"

3
10
reply

Required fields are marked *

Obviously, its a play on "covering" a story in journalism, that is, writing about it. So no story would be off-limits.

Also, in the politics which I assume will be the shows rationale for murders, "nothing uncovered" would mean that nothing is really out in the open or transparent.

I guess, @attiton, that you are such a positive person that you are unfamiliar how people might use a double negative!

1
9
reply

Required fields are marked *

No, I disagree with you and think both the title of the drama itself and program-within-the-drama are poorly translated into English.

Not all of us have access to such highly-educated and intelligent pedants as you to swoop in and explain the details of this intricate pun to us.

0
5
reply

Required fields are marked *

As you know, I celebrate my pedantry! But to say journalists covering a story is intricate? You've never read that "the New York Times is covering this story?" A news organization that leaves no story uncovered, that is no story uninvestigated seems nonsensical? I guess in the west coast we speak a different form of English, bro!

0

No, what I'm saying is that "Nothing Left Uncovered" has the precise same semantic meaning as your interpretation of "Nothing Uncovered," and yet is clearer English not only to native, but to non-native, speakers of the language. Sure it's not as punny, but it's less confusing.

As it stands, on first glance, and perhaps to folks who aren't @hacja , it simply reads like everything's going to stay hidden which makes ZERO sense for a news program and holds ZERO interest as an advertisement for a plot (where nothing is ever revealed).

If they were to keep it the way you feel is sufficient, I'd still add a hyphen for clarity, "Nothing Un-Covered" to make the pun more plain.

0

Well, in all seriousness, I can say if there was an investigative a news show called "Nothing Uncovered" it would make a lot more sense to me than it being called "Sixty Minutes."

0

BUT THE SHOW WAS SIXTY MINUTES LONG!!! That's how long they were gonna talk to you! And there was a stopwatch behind the journalists telling you how many of those sixty minutes remained!!! It was like "Keep watching our investigative journalism, folks...there's only so much time left before you get to the funny part with Andy Rooney! You can do it!"

Clear as day.

2

Re: sixty minutes. You mean Andy Rooney's "humorous" commentary didn't take up the whole sixty minutes? It sure seemed like it the few times I watched that show.

1

Thanks for trying to explain but it stills seems clunky to me. (I learned English in Alhambra, California in the 60s and 70s.)

1
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

I mean, who are we kidding?? At this point, we might all prefer for the show to have benn called, "Let Me Grab You by the Collar/Let's Get Grabbed by the Collar," which is (apparently) the more literal translation of the Korean title.

Both male leads are welcome to grab me by my collar any day. We can leave nothing (un)covered.

1

Here I was thinking that "Nothing Uncovered" was a pretty clever retitle, a lot better than "Grabbed by the Collar" (which clearly was either the title of the original fictional investigative show, or a catch phrase the FL used, because the mistress/actress referred to it a couple of times, once in the request for a selfie with the journalist, and then in the confrontation over her husband)--only to be called a "pedant!"
Next my fellow DB commentators will be telling me they don't want to read my 10,000 word essay on "Branding in Seongsu!"

1

Isn’t Jung-won’s television program called “Grabbed by the Collar” (like the original title of this drama)? Cha Eun-sae even referenced that when she took the selfie. She wanted Jung-won to grab her collar. Jung-won wisely declined.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

This episode was great, and episode two was even better. I'm hooked.

I'm not bummed by the trend of bad husbands in dramas because it seems to be a reflection of the very real issue of misogyny Korea. The marriage rate is down and the birth rate is way down and we can't ignore that misogyny is a factor in that.

1
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Let me give a little shout out to Yeon Woo-jin’s introductory action scenes for his character Detective Kim Tae-heon. He looked like he can take care of himself. After a rewatch he may have had a stunt double for that crazy jump (apologies if I am wrong) but overall well done.

His partner on the other hand leaves something to be desired in an ace young detective which I am usually a sucker for. I hope Detective Oh Myung-soo gets it together.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Yes! I loved the action scene.
His partner is ridiculous. He is not funny. He comes across as half baked.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

oh c'mon... why would a journalist/reporter mess up a crime scene by touching the bodies for pete's sake??

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *

Just here to say I wasn't very impressed with eps 1 and 2. I doubt I'll continue to watch. Too many dead bodies, acting little hammy, unnecessarily makjang-y... Does not promise to be a fun combination

0
2
reply

Required fields are marked *

Hopefully Hide, which I believe is coming soon, is a better drama.
I am continuing for now because I want to know a few reveals but could be a potential drop down the line.

1
1
reply

Required fields are marked *

HIDE looks so similar - I was confused - I actually thought they were alternate names for the same drama! Hah.

1
reply

Required fields are marked *

Ok so I really like this cast...the first 2 eps were pretty solid but I don't understand why there's another drama so similar to My Happy Ending...
1. Career woman who has no time for her husband
2. Career woman needs to see a psychiatrist
3. Amazing house-husband who seems perfect but has secrets to hide
4. A close guy friend who has feelings for this woman and always ready to be her hero
5. Shady father/father-figure

Having said that, the pacing of this show is much better than My Happy Ending. I'm also pleased to see JSJ again after watching him in Death's Game. Kim Ha Neul always delivers. Love her voice and her balance of strength & vulnerability.

0
0
reply

Required fields are marked *